Gold Object Security Code Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Valuable objects, such as gold jewelry, can be manipulated without external detection, requiring time-consuming and costly laboratory tests that may damage the item, making it difficult to verify authenticity and value.

Innovation Solution

A gold object with a protective layer containing a personalized, readable security code and additional security features, allowing for non-destructive identification and verification, using nanoparticles and secure database storage for unique code management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If laboratory testing methods are used to detect manipulation, then manipulation can be detected, but the process is time-consuming and cost-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A security code is integrated into the protective layer during manufacturing, enabling immediate verification without time-consuming laboratory tests. The code is embedded beforehand, allowing rapid authentication whenever needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Physical laboratory testing methods are replaced with optical/electronic reading of the security code. Instead of destructive material analysis, a non-contact or minimal-contact reading process verifies authenticity, dramatically reducing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If destructive testing is used to detect manipulation, then manipulation can be detected, but the valuable item is destroyed or considerably damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddamage to valuable object
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Destructive physical testing is replaced by reading the security code embedded in the protective layer. This optical or electronic reading process detects manipulation without touching or damaging the valuable object, maintaining both reliability and object integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The security code embedded in the protective layer serves as an intermediary that carries authentication information. Instead of testing the valuable object directly, the code is read to verify authenticity, eliminating the need for destructive sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If no security features are added, then the valuable object maintains its original appearance, but manipulation cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation detectabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security code is nested within the protective layer that already surrounds the valuable object. This integration adds detection capability without requiring separate external components, minimizing additional complexity while maximizing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The security code function is merged with the protective layer structure. Instead of adding separate security components, the authentication feature is combined with the existing protective coating, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If a protective layer is added to prevent wear, then surface protection is improved, but manipulation becomes externally imperceptible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratch resistanceVSAvoidmanipulation detectability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The security code is embedded in the protective layer during manufacturing, before any potential manipulation occurs. This preliminary inclusion of authentication information enables future detection of tampering without affecting the protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protective layer has different local properties: it provides uniform wear protection across the surface, while containing a specific local security code feature that enables manipulation detection. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between protection and detectability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10438435B2Valuable object and a system and method for identifying and verifying a valuable object
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 NIEDERMEIER KLAUS
  • US10438435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a valuable object (1) comprising a gold base body (2) surrounded by a protective layer (3). The protective layer (3) comprises at least one readable security code for identification and verification purposes. The invention also relates to a system and method for identifying and verifying a valuable object (1), having at least one readable security code (6) being assigned thereto. The security code (6) of the valuable object (1) is stored in a secure database (4) for identifying and verifying a valuable object (1).