Two-Piece Golf Ball Core Cover Deformation Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Two-piece golf balls with high core deformation for soft feel at impact suffer from poor durability due to the inability of the cover to follow core deformation, leading to breakage, especially in low-temperature conditions and mishits.

Innovation Solution

A two-piece golf ball design featuring a core with compressive deformation of 4.1 mm or greater and a thin cover with nominal thickness of 1.70 mm or less, along with a specific dimple pattern and Shore C hardness distribution, to achieve both soft feel and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a core with large compressive deformation is used to achieve soft feel at impact, then the feel at impact is improved, but the cover cannot follow the deformation and breaks, reducing durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel at impactVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the compressive deformation of the core (Df ≥ 4.1 mm) and the thickness of the cover (T ≤ 1.70 mm) to achieve an optimal balance. By adjusting these parameters, the core can deform sufficiently to provide soft feel while the cover maintains enough structural integrity to prevent breakage, resolving the contradiction between feel and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining a core made from specific rubber compositions (including polybutadiene and other base rubbers with controlled hardness and deformation characteristics) with a cover made from different materials having appropriate thickness and strength properties. This composite structure allows the core to provide deformation for soft feel while the cover provides the necessary durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the cover thickness is reduced to improve feel at impact, then the softness is improved, but the cover becomes more prone to breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel at impactVSAvoidcover strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the compressive deformation of the core (Df ≥ 4.1 mm) and the thickness of the cover (T ≤ 1.70 mm) to achieve an optimal balance. By adjusting these parameters, the core can deform sufficiently to provide soft feel while the cover maintains enough structural integrity to prevent breakage, resolving the contradiction between feel and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the core deformation is increased to provide soft feel, then the comfort on mishit is improved, but the cover breaks due to inability to follow deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort on mishitVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the compressive deformation of the core (Df ≥ 4.1 mm) and the thickness of the cover (T ≤ 1.70 mm) to achieve an optimal balance. By adjusting these parameters, the core can deform sufficiently to provide soft feel while the cover maintains enough structural integrity to prevent breakage, resolving the contradiction between feel and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a golf ball with excellent feel at impact and improved durability, reducing the likelihood of breakage and maintaining performance across various temperatures and hit conditions.

Implementation Method 1

An amount of compressive deformation Df of the core is equal to or greater than 4.1 mm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressive deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The shock generated by this shot is small. Upon a mishit, a golf ball is hit at a portion of a clubface other than the sweet spot. The shock upon the mishit is large.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

A nominal thickness T of the cover is equal to or less than 1.70 mm. The golf ball has both excellent feel at impact and excellent durability.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial strength:

Implementation Method 4

a Shore C hardness H of the cover meet the following mathematical formulas (1), (2), and (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHardness:

Data Source

PatentEP3181200B1Two-piece golf ball
Publication Date: 2020.04.15 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • EP3181200B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3181200B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3181200B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A golf ball 2 includes a core 4 and a cover 6. An amount of compressive deformation Df of the core 4 is equal to or greater than 4.1 mm. A nominal thickness T of the cover 6 is equal to or less than 1.70 mm. The golf ball 2 has a plurality of dimples 8 on a surface thereof. A value V calculated by the following mathematical formula is equal to or less than 290. V=N*So/Bb In the mathematical formula, N represents a total number of the dimples 8, So represents a ratio of a total area of all the dimples 8 relative to a surface area of a phantom sphere of the golf ball 2, and Bb represents an average (mm) of thicknesses B of the cover 6 immediately below deepest points of the dimples 8.