Multi-piece Golf Ball Core and Cover Hardness Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-piece solid golf balls fail to simultaneously achieve excellent flight performance, feel on impact, controllability, spin performance, and durability, with previous designs often compromising on one or more of these attributes.

Innovation Solution

A multi-piece solid golf ball with a solid core, an intermediate layer made from a specific resin mixture, and a polyurethane cover, optimized for hardness profiles and dimple configuration, which includes a highly neutralized ionomer in the intermediate layer and polyurethane in the cover to enhance spin performance and scuff resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an ionomer cover with high Shore D hardness is used, then durability is improved, but spin performance on approach shots deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidspin performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is divided into two distinct layers: an inner cover layer made of ionomer resin for durability and an outer cover layer made of urethane resin for spin performance. This segmentation allows each layer to fulfill its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover uses a composite structure combining ionomer resin and urethane resin in specific layers. The inner layer uses ionomer for its durability and scuff resistance, while the outer layer uses urethane for its spin characteristics, creating a composite material system that achieves both durability and spin performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the cover thickness is increased, then durability is improved, but flight performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidflight performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The cover thickness is segmented into two functional layers with specific thickness ranges. The inner cover layer has a thickness of 0.3-1.5mm providing durability, while the outer cover layer has a thickness of 0.1-0.5mm maintaining flight performance. This segmented approach optimizes the overall thickness distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the cover have different thicknesses and material properties tailored to their specific functions. The inner layer is thicker for durability in areas requiring protection, while the outer layer is thinner to maintain aerodynamic properties and flight performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If a soft intermediate layer material is used, then feel on impact is improved, but rebound deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel on impactVSAvoidrebound
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate layer uses a specific resin mixture with controlled hardness parameters (Shore D 35-55) and composition ratios. By precisely adjusting the hardness and elastic modulus of the intermediate layer, the ball achieves optimal feel on impact while maintaining sufficient rebound through the coordinated design of other layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate layer employs a composite resin mixture containing specific components in defined ratios, creating a material with balanced mechanical properties that provides both soft feel and adequate rebound characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Speed

If the core hardness is increased, then flight performance is improved, but controllability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight performanceVSAvoidcontrollability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The core has a non-uniform hardness distribution with different hardness values at different locations and depths. The core hardness varies from the center to the periphery and from the surface inward, with specific hardness ranges defined at different radial positions to optimize both flight performance and controllability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The core hardness parameters are precisely controlled within specific ranges (Shore D 20-38 at center, 37-62 at surface) to achieve the desired balance between flight performance and controllability through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8672775B2Multi-piece solid golf ball
Publication Date: 2014.03.18 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO LTD
  • US8672775B2 patent drawing
  • US8672775B2 patent drawing
  • US8672775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a multi-piece solid golf ball composed of a solid core, a cover, at least one intermediate layer situated therebetween, and a plurality of dimples on a surface of the ball. The diameter of the solid core, the deflection of the core when compressed under a final load of 130 kgf from an initial load of 10 kgf, the hardness at the center of the core, the hardness in a region 5 mm to 10 mm from the center of the core, the hardness 15 mm from the center of the core, and the surface hardness are set within specific ranges. The intermediate layer is composed primarily of a material obtained by mixing under applied heat a specific resin composition and the cover is formed primarily of polyurethane. And, the number of dimples and the trajectory volume TVT are set within specific ranges. The golf ball of the invention has an excellent flight performance, feel, controllability and scuff resistance.