Multi-layer Core Golf Ball Hardness Gradient

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf balls with multi-layer cores often require a casing layer, which complicates their construction and may not achieve optimal performance without it.

Innovation Solution

A golf ball design featuring a center, an intermediate core layer, and an outer core layer, all formed from the same or different rubber compositions, with specific hardness and thickness ranges, eliminating the need for a casing layer while maintaining performance characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a casing layer is added to multi-layer core golf balls, then structural integrity and performance are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of multiple core layers into a unified multi-layer core structure where the intermediate layer integrates both structural support and performance characteristics. This consolidation eliminates the need for a separate casing layer while maintaining structural integrity through the coordinated design of three core layers with specific hardness relationships (center: 50-65 Shore C, intermediate: 70-85 Shore C, outer: 75-90 Shore C).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediate core layer serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural transition between the soft center and hard outer layer, contributes to ball compression characteristics, and delivers durability. This multi-functionality replaces what would traditionally require a separate casing layer, reducing overall construction complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If core layer hardness is increased, then durability is improved, but playability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidplayability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different hardness characteristics to different regions of the core. The center remains soft (50-65 Shore C) for optimal energy transfer and playability, the intermediate layer provides moderate hardness (70-85 Shore C) for structural transition, and only the outermost layer is hard (75-90 Shore C) for durability. This gradient structure ensures that durability improvements do not compromise playability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-dimension hardness approach to a three-dimensional gradient structure. By creating radial variation in hardness across the core layers, the patent achieves both durability (through the hard outer layer) and playability (through the soft center), resolving the contradiction by adding a dimensional aspect to the hardness distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8382612B2Multi-layer core golf ball
Publication Date: 2013.02.26 ACUSHNET CO
  • US8382612B2 patent drawing
  • US8382612B2 patent drawing
  • US8382612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Golf balls consisting of a multi-layer core and a cover are disclosed. The multi-layer core consists of a large center and a thin outer core layer that are both soft relative to a hard, thin intermediate core layer.