Multi-piece Golf Ball Core Hardness Profile Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-piece solid golf balls fail to achieve both good flight performance and a solid yet soft feel at impact, while also lacking sufficient durability against cracking.

Innovation Solution

Optimizing the hardness profile of the core and the thickness relationships among the core, envelope, and intermediate layers, specifically by controlling Shore D hardness values and layer thicknesses, to reduce spin rate and enhance initial velocity and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the core hardness is increased to reduce spin rate and improve flight performance, then distance is improved, but the feel at impact becomes too hard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial velocityVSAvoidfeel at impact
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into regions with different hardness values: a first core region with hardness 40-50 and a second core region with hardness 50-60. This local differentiation allows the ball to achieve low spin rate (improving distance) while maintaining a soft feel at impact, resolving the contradiction between flight performance and impact feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the envelope layer and intermediate layer are made thinner to improve feel at impact, then softness is improved, but durability to cracking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel at impactVSAvoiddurability to cracking
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies precise thickness parameters for the envelope layer (0.3-1.2 mm) and intermediate layer (0.3-1.2 mm), with their sum being 0.8-1.7 mm. By optimizing these dimensional parameters, the ball achieves both soft feel at impact and sufficient durability, resolving the contradiction between comfort and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the core hardness gradient is increased to reduce spin rate, then flight performance is improved, but the complexity of core structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin rateVSAvoidcore structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core structure is simplified into two distinct regions with different hardness values rather than using complex multi-layer or continuously varying gradients. This localized differentiation achieves the desired spin rate reduction while keeping the core structure relatively simple and manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10874912B2Multi-piece solid golf ball
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO LTD
  • US10874912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-piece solid golf ball for professional golfers and skilled amateurs in particular is endowed with an excellent distance, a soft yet good feel at impact and a good durability. In the ball, which includes a core, an envelope layer, an intermediate layer and a cover, the core has a hardness profile which satisfies specific conditions, the envelope layer has a thickness of from 0.3 to 1.2 mm, the intermediate layer has a thickness of from 0.3 to 1.2 mm, and the envelope and intermediate layers have a combined thickness from of 0.8 to 1.7 mm.