Golf Ball Dimples with Asymmetric Edge Angles for Trajectory Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf balls do not effectively stabilize the trajectory of the ball in flight, as they focus primarily on improving distance without ensuring stable aerodynamic performance and trajectory stability.

Innovation Solution

The golf ball features a unique cross-sectional dimple shape where edge angles at specific depths (10%, 20%, and 30%) follow the condition ED1 < ED2 > ED3, with these dimples accounting for at least 10% of the total, and additional conditions on edge angles at 40%, 50%, and 60% depths to optimize aerodynamic performance and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If dimples are optimized for distance improvement, then the ball travels farther, but the trajectory stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedistanceVSAvoidtrajectory stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different dimple types with distinct cross-sectional shapes (convex, concave, flat bottom) distributed across the ball surface. Each dimple type has specific edge angle characteristics at different depth percentages, allowing localized optimization of aerodynamic properties while maintaining overall trajectory stability through the combination of multiple dimple types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetry by defining specific edge angle relationships (ED1 < ED2 > ED3) that create asymmetric dimple profiles. This asymmetric geometry optimizes the interaction between the dimples and airflow, improving both distance and trajectory stability by creating favorable pressure distributions and flow attachment characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional dimple shapes are used, then manufacturing is simple, but aerodynamic performance and flight stability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimple formation simplicityVSAvoidaerodynamic performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by specifying precise edge angle ranges at different depth percentages (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%) of the dimple depth. These parameter specifications ensure consistent aerodynamic performance across all dimples while allowing for standard manufacturing processes. The edge angle parameters are controlled within specific ranges to achieve reliable flight stability without requiring complex manufacturing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of moving object

If dimple depth variation is optimized, then distance increases, but trajectory stability does not improve

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedistanceVSAvoidflight stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the dimple depth into multiple percentage levels (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%) and specifying edge angle characteristics at each level. This segmentation allows for precise control of the dimple profile shape, creating optimal aerodynamic performance for distance while the consistent application of these segmented parameters across all dimples ensures trajectory stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a stable trajectory and improved flight stability by optimizing the edge angles of the dimples, reducing variation in the ball's flight path and enhancing aerodynamic performance.

Implementation Method 1

air resistance during flight is reduced by dimples formed on a ball surface to improve aerodynamic properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS20250090909A1Golf ball
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO LTD
  • US20250090909A1 patent drawing
  • US20250090909A1 patent drawing
  • US20250090909A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a golf ball in which a large number of dimples are formed on a ball surface, and when edge angles at points where depths are 10%, 20%, and 30% in a cross-section of one dimple are denoted by ED1, ED2, and ED3, respectively, dimples having a cross-sectional shape satisfying the following condition (1):ED1&lt;ED2&gt;ED3  (1)account for at least 10% of a total number of the dimples.