Multi-Layer Golf Ball Hardness Profile for Spin and Wear Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf balls struggle to balance flight distance on driver shots with spin performance on approach shots, particularly under grass conditions, and lack sufficient wear and stain resistance, while also failing to provide a consistent shot feeling on putting.

Innovation Solution

A golf ball design comprising a spherical core with specific hardness distributions, an intermediate layer of controlled thickness, a cover made from a specific material, and a paint film formed from a particular resin, which together enhance wear resistance, stain resistance, and provide a balanced spin and flight performance across different shot types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the golf ball is designed for high initial velocity and low spin rate on driver shots, then flight distance is improved, but spin performance on approach shots deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial velocity on driver shotsVSAvoidspin performance on approach shots
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spherical core has a non-uniform hardness distribution with different hardness values at different radial distances from the center. The core hardness varies from H0 at the center to Hs at the surface, with specific hardness values H5, H10, and H15 at intermediate points. This local variation in hardness allows the core to provide different mechanical responses for different shot types: low spin for driver shots and high spin for approach shots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for the core hardness distribution, including the relationships between H0, H5, H10, H15, and Hs. By controlling these hardness parameters and their spatial distribution, the golf ball achieves optimized performance across different shot types. The intermediate layer thickness (1.30-1.80 mm) and cover material loss modulus are also controlled within specific ranges to fine-tune the spin characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the golf ball surface is made softer to improve shot feeling on putting, then putting performance is improved, but wear resistance and stain resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshot feeling on puttingVSAvoidwear resistance and stain resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The golf ball employs a multi-layer composite structure consisting of a spherical core, an intermediate layer, a cover, and a paint film. Each layer is made of materials with specific properties: the core provides shot feeling through its hardness distribution, the intermediate layer (1.30-1.80 mm thick) provides structural support, the cover provides durability, and the paint film (formed from resin with specific stress-strain characteristics) provides wear and stain resistance while maintaining putting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The paint film is applied specifically on the outer surface of the golf ball, providing wear and stain resistance only where needed for durability, while the underlying layers maintain the shot feeling properties. The paint film's mechanical properties (stress-strain characteristics) are specifically engineered to balance protection with putting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the intermediate layer thickness is increased to improve shot feeling, then putting performance is improved, but compression deformation increases affecting flight distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshot feeling on puttingVSAvoidflight distance on driver shots
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate layer thickness is precisely controlled within the range of 1.30-1.80 mm. This parameter optimization balances the competing requirements: sufficient thickness to provide cushioning and shot feeling on putting, but not so thick as to excessive compression deformation that would reduce initial velocity and flight distance on driver shots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250381452A1Golf ball
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20250381452A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381452A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381452A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An object of the present disclosure is to provide a golf ball that has an improved surface wear resistance and an improved stain resistance on bunker shots, has a well-balanced total performance of a spin performance on approach shots and middle iron shots and a flight distance performance on driver shots, and has an improved shot feeling on putting. The present disclosure provides a golf ball comprising a spherical core, an intermediate layer, a cover and a paint film, wherein a center hardness of the spherical core, each hardness at 5, 10 or 15 mm point from a center of the spherical core, and a surface hardness of the spherical core (H0, H5, H10, H15, Hs) satisfy predetermined relationships, the intermediate layer has a thickness in a range from 1.30 mm to 1.80 mm, the cover is formed from a material having a loss modulus (E″−40) in a range from 6.50×107 Pa to 22.0×107 Pa and a loss modulus (E″−20) in a range from 3.50×107 Pa to 7.10×107 Pa, the paint film is formed from a resin satisfying a relationship of 0.10≤ε1/M10≤1.00 wherein M10 (kgf/cm2) is a stress at which a strain is 10%, and ε1(%) is a strain at which a stress during decrease in deformation is 0 kgf/cm2, and the golf ball has a compression deformation amount of 2.00 mm or more and less than 2.70 mm.