Golf Club Head Contoured Backstop for COR Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Golf club heads typically designed to contact the ball at the center result in less energy transfer during off-center hits, limiting distance due to reduced coefficient of restitution (COR), which is further constrained by the USGA limit of 0.83.

Innovation Solution

A golf club head with a contoured backstop arranged behind the ball striking surface, allowing for increased flexibility in the central region while preventing overflexing, achieved through a varying gap size between the backstop and the ball striking surface, thereby optimizing COR across different swing speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the ball striking surface is made flexible to increase COR, then energy transfer is improved, but the surface may overflex and fail under high swing speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy transferVSAvoidsurface integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The backstop is positioned at specific locations behind the ball striking surface to provide localized support where needed. The distance between the backstop and the ball striking surface varies across different regions, creating zones of different flexibility that optimize both energy transfer and prevent overflexing under various impact conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The golf club head employs a composite structure combining a flexible ball striking surface with a rigid backstop support system. This composite design allows the face to flex for energy transfer while the backstop provides structural integrity to prevent failure under high swing speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the ball striking surface is made rigid to prevent failure, then reliability is improved, but COR decreases reducing distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface integrityVSAvoidenergy transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than making the entire ball striking surface uniformly rigid or flexible, the design creates local variations in flexibility through strategically positioned backstops. This allows different regions of the face to have optimized flexibility characteristics, maintaining overall reliability while enabling energy transfer where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If a thin walled ball striking surface is used to increase flexibility, then COR is improved, but the surface becomes more prone to failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy transferVSAvoidsurface strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The design combines a thin-walled flexible ball striking surface with a rigid backstop support structure. This composite construction allows the face to be thin for flexibility while the backstop provides the necessary strength and support to prevent failure under impact loads

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The backstop design changes the structural parameters of the club head by introducing a support element at a specific distance from the ball striking surface. This parameter modification allows the thin-walled surface to achieve the required flexibility while the backstop ensures sufficient strength to prevent failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The contoured backstop enhances flexibility, particularly in central regions, improving COR for lower swing speeds while ensuring compliance with USGA limits for higher swing speeds, reducing the risk of material failure and maintaining performance.

Implementation Method 1

the backstop may be contoured to provide a greater distance between the ball striking surface and the backstop in a central region of the backstop and ball striking surface than in an end region of the backstop and ball striking surface. This increased distance near a central region allows for additional flexing of the ball striking surface in the central region than nearer the end regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9440122B2Golf clubs and golf club head structures having contoured backstop
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 KARSTEN MFG CORP
  • US9440122B2 patent drawing
  • US9440122B2 patent drawing
  • US9440122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Golf club and golf club head structures include an inner wall or backstop arranged behind a ball striking surface of the golf club head and defining a gap between the inner wall and a rear surface of the ball striking surface. In some arrangements, the size of the gap may vary along a heel-to-toe length of the inner wall or backstop. For instance, the size of the gap may gradually increase from a first end of the inner wall toward a central region of the inner wall, and may gradually decrease from the central region toward a second end of the inner wall. In some examples, the inner wall or backstop may be connected to the golf club head, for instance, at a first end and/or a second end.