Golf Club Head Performance Selection via Impact Probability Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring the performance of golf club heads, particularly for golfers with higher handicaps, are inadequate as they do not accurately represent the overall performance due to ball impacts occurring at various locations on the striking face, which the characteristic time (CT) value alone cannot capture.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a model golf club head with structural attributes, generating data on coefficient of restitution (COR) and impact probability, calculating an expected overall performance value, and modifying the club head's attributes to optimize performance based on this data, while ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If characteristic time (CT) measurement is used to evaluate golf club head performance, then regulatory compliance is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates for higher handicap golfers who impact balls at various face locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidperformance representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The striking face is divided into multiple discrete locations, with CT measurements taken at each location individually. This segmentation allows the system to capture the variability in performance across different impact zones rather than relying on a single centralized measurement point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the striking face are evaluated with their own specific CT values and performance characteristics. The system assigns localized performance data to each face location, enabling tailored club head design where different areas have optimized properties for their specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If multiple structural attributes are modified to optimize expected overall performance value, then performance accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance assessment accuracyVSAvoidclub head design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system modifies multiple structural parameters of the club head including face thickness, material composition, and geometric configuration at different locations. By systematically varying these parameters and evaluating their impact on expected overall performance value, the design process optimizes multiple attributes simultaneously while managing complexity through structured analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for a more accurate assessment and selection of golf club heads tailored to individual golfer needs, improving performance by adjusting the club head's structure to enhance coefficient of restitution where it is most needed, thus providing a better representation of real-world impact scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

characteristic time (CT) measurement of the face of the club head... relationship information between locations about the striking face location and predicted coefficient of restitution or characteristic time values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11759687B2Performance-based golf club selection system and method
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US11759687B2 patent drawing
  • US11759687B2 patent drawing
  • US11759687B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of selecting a golf club head for a specific user, includes: (a) receiving first data comprising impact location of each of a plurality of golf swings taken by the user using a test golf club; (b) generating an impact probability map specific to the user; (c) providing second data comprising correlations between striking face location and coefficient of restitution (COR) for each of a plurality of golf clubs; (d) calculating a user-specific expected COR value for each of the plurality of golf clubs based on the first data, the impact probability map, and the second data for each of the plurality of golf clubs; and (e) outputting and displaying golf club preference information based on the calculated user-specific expected COR.