Golf Ball Core Rubber Composition Hardness Gradient
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing golf ball rubber compositions fail to effectively create a large hardness difference within a single-layer core, which limits the spin rate-lowering effect and durability of golf balls, despite attempts to adjust compounding ingredients and vulcanization conditions.
Innovation Solution
A rubber composition for golf balls comprising a base rubber, an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid or its metal salt, organic peroxide, water or a moisture-providing agent, and a hindered phenol-type antioxidant with a thioether structure, which promotes a crosslinked structure disparity between the core surface and center, enhancing durability and spin properties.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If a single-layer rubber core is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the hardness difference between core surface and center is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by creating different crosslinking densities at different locations within the single-layer core. The core surface has high crosslinking density (high hardness) while the center has low crosslinking density (low hardness), achieving the desired hardness gradient without requiring multiple layers. This is accomplished through controlled peroxide decomposition and crosslinking reactions that proceed differently at the surface versus the center during vulcanization.
2Object-generated harmful factors
If the cross-sectional hardness of the core is increased, then the spin rate on full shots is reduced, but the feel on impact deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent resolves this contradiction by creating a spatial gradient in hardness: the core surface has high hardness (high crosslinking density) to reduce spin rate on full shots, while the core center maintains low hardness (low crosslinking density) to preserve good feel on impact. This local differentiation of properties allows both requirements to be satisfied simultaneously within a single-layer core structure.
3Manufacturing precision
If co-crosslinking agents such as methacrylic acid or acrylic acid are added to the rubber composition, then the core hardness is adjusted, but the spin properties remain insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent goes beyond simply adjusting the type and amount of co-crosslinking agents. Instead, it changes the fundamental parameter of crosslinking density distribution in space by controlling peroxide decomposition and crosslinking reactions. This creates a gradient in crosslinking density from surface to center, which simultaneously optimizes both core hardness and spin properties, overcoming the limitations of conventional uniform crosslinking approaches.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The composition achieves a significant hardness difference within the core, improving the durability to cracking and maintaining desired spin properties, leading to enhanced golf ball performance.
Implementation Method 1
an organic peroxide
Implementation Method 2
a hindered phenol-type antioxidant including a substituent having thioether structure
Data Source
AI summary
The invention provides a rubber composition for golf balls, comprising: (a) a base rubber, (b) a co-crosslinking agent which is an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid or a metal salt thereof or both, (c) an organic peroxide, (d) water or a moisture-providing agent, (e) a hindered phenol-type antioxidant including a substituent having thioether structure, wherein the content of component (e) is at least 0.2 part by weight per 100 parts by weight of component (a).


