Virtual Golf Course Simulation for Maintenance Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Golf course maintenance is costly and resource-intensive, with challenges in estimating maintenance needs and optimizing resource allocation across different course components, while balancing playability, beauty, and enjoyment.

Innovation Solution

A virtual golf course simulation system that calculates maintenance costs and resource consumption for various course components, allowing officials to redesign and reconfigure the course based on player data and resource allocation, using geometric polygon representations and player tracking to optimize maintenance efforts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If golf course maintenance is intensified to maintain playability, beauty, and challenge, then course quality is improved, but maintenance costs and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecourse playability and qualityVSAvoidmaintenance cost and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating maintenance levels across different course components based on their strategic importance and usage patterns. The system segments the golf course into multiple zones (e.g., playable areas vs. non-playable areas) and assigns different maintenance intensities to each zone. This allows high-quality maintenance to be concentrated on areas that directly impact playability and player experience, while reducing or eliminating maintenance in areas with minimal impact, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining course quality and reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting maintenance parameters such as mowing frequency, irrigation levels, and fertilizer application based on real-time data about course usage, weather conditions, and component priorities. The system allows course officials to modify maintenance parameters for specific zones without affecting the entire course, enabling optimization of resource allocation while maintaining necessary quality standards in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If course components are modified to reduce maintenance costs, then resource consumption is reduced, but playability and beauty may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance cost reductionVSAvoidcourse playability and beauty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using virtual simulation and modeling to predict the impact of maintenance modifications before implementing them on the actual course. The system allows course officials to test different maintenance scenarios, modify course component parameters, and evaluate their effects on both cost reduction and playability maintenance in a virtual environment. This preliminary testing ensures that cost-saving modifications do not compromise course quality before real-world implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring course conditions, player responses, and maintenance effectiveness. The system provides real-time feedback to course officials about how maintenance modifications are affecting playability and player satisfaction, allowing for adjustments to be made if quality thresholds are not met. This closed-loop feedback ensures that cost reduction efforts do not inadvertently harm course playability or beauty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If detailed tracking and analysis of player locations is implemented, then maintenance optimization is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance optimization efficiencyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a multi-functional tracking and analysis system that serves multiple purposes beyond just maintenance optimization. The same tracking infrastructure is used for player experience analysis, course usage patterns, safety monitoring, and operational efficiency improvements. This multi-functionality justifies the system complexity by delivering multiple benefits from a single investment, thereby improving the productivity-to-complexity ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10248921B2Analyzing and optimizing maintenance of golf courses and golf course designs by use of allocable resources
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 US GOLF ASSOC
  • US10248921B2 patent drawing
  • US10248921B2 patent drawing
  • US10248921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf course maintenance system and method which comprises the input of a golf course and its shape, size and parameters into a computer-like system. The course is segmented into teeing grounds, fairways, one or more rough areas, water hazards, bunkers, and putting greens. Each such component of the holes and course is calculated into square foot or square yards surface area. Each such component is then calculated for maintenance purposes based upon cost components for maintenances, namely, cost and quantity of labor and Consumables such as fuel, energy, water, chemicals, fertilizers. The Course Officials can input into a CPU connected to a display screen the approximate configuration, length, width, and location of teeing grounds, fairways, rough, water hazards, bunkers, and putting greens. Each of these Course Components is then associated with a set of Processes to maintain them and each Process is associated with cost factors, e.g., labor, consumables resources such as fuel and water, etc. The Course Officials can then consider the modification of the Course Components of the hole(s) and the course while the CPU calculates and displays the cost and consumed resource savings, if any, by a change in the boundary of the Course Components. Also, the modification(s) to be considered are expected to take into account the frequency that players' shots land or lie in various locations of the Course Components as a set of players are tracked on the actual golf course and those tracked movements are provided to the CPU and/or the Course Officials or other User of the system to facilitate the modification of the Course Components.