Golf Club Head Crown Segmentation for CG Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current golf club heads do not effectively optimize the center of gravity (CG) and moment of inertia (MOI) to enhance launch angle, spin rate, and direction consistency across various golf swings, leading to inconsistent ball flight.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a golf club head with a body portion made from materials like aluminum, magnesium, or titanium, featuring a crown portion with thin sections and integral ribs for weight reduction and structural reinforcement, along with a protruding portion to lower the CG, and a face portion that can be integral or separate, enhancing structural integrity and aerodynamics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the crown portion is made with thin sections to reduce weight, then the center of gravity is lowered and weight is reduced, but the structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The crown portion is divided into multiple thin sections or layers rather than being a single thick structure. This segmentation reduces overall weight while maintaining structural integrity through the distributed arrangement of multiple thinner elements that collectively provide the necessary strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crown portion utilizes composite material construction, combining multiple materials with different properties. This allows the thin sections to achieve both weight reduction and enhanced structural strength by leveraging the complementary characteristics of different materials in a composite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If integral ribs are added to the crown portion for structural reinforcement, then structural strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural reinforcementVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integral ribs are merged with the crown portion as a single integrated structure rather than being separate components. This combining approach provides structural reinforcement while minimizing complexity by eliminating the need for additional assembly steps or separate parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integral ribs are strategically positioned in specific locations within the crown portion where structural reinforcement is most needed. This local quality approach applies reinforcement only where necessary rather than uniformly throughout, optimizing strength while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the center of gravity is lowered to improve launch angle consistency, then ball flight predictability is enhanced, but the club head design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaunch angle consistencyVSAvoidclub head design
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The center of gravity is lowered by modifying the vertical dimension of the club head design, specifically through the thin-section crown portion that extends downward. This dimensional change achieves CG optimization without requiring complex adjustments in other dimensions or aspects of the design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The design utilizes parameter changes in the crown portion geometry, specifically varying the thickness and shape parameters to strategically position the center of gravity. By adjusting these geometric parameters, the CG is optimized for consistent launch angles without fundamentally redesigning the entire club head structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20200261775A9Golf club heads and methods to manufacture golf club heads
Publication Date: 2020.08.20 PARSONS XTREME GOLF LLC
  • US20200261775A9 patent drawing
  • US20200261775A9 patent drawing
  • US20200261775A9 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of golf club heads and methods to manufacture golf club heads are generally described herein. In one example, a golf club head may include a body portion having a front portion, a rear portion, a toe portion, a heel portion, a top portion, and a bottom portion. The front portion may include a front pocket defined by an interior wall. A face portion may be positioned in the front pocket. The material of the face portion may have a substantially higher yield strength than the material of the interior wall. Other examples and embodiments may be described and claimed.