Golf Ball Dimple Profile with Conical Top and Polynomial Bottom

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf ball dimples lack control over edge angle independently from diameter and depth, limiting aerodynamic performance, and existing non-spherical dimple designs often result in sharp demarcation lines or cumbersome mathematical descriptions.

Innovation Solution

The golf ball features dimples with a top conical sidewall and a bottom portion defined by polynomial, trigonometric, hyperbolic, or exponential functions, with a saucer ratio between 0.05 and 0.75, allowing for independent control of edge angle and chord depth, and a transition ratio between 0.02 and 0.50, to create a smooth continuous profile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional spherical dimples are used, then manufacturing is simple, but edge angle cannot be controlled independently from diameter and depth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge angle controlVSAvoiddimple profile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dimple profile is segmented into two distinct portions: a top conical sidewall portion and a bottom portion defined by a mathematical function. This segmentation allows independent control of the edge angle (determined by the conical portion) from the depth and overall shape (determined by the bottom portion), resolving the technical contradiction by enabling edge angle control without requiring complete profile redefinition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the dimple are assigned different geometric qualities: the top portion uses a conical geometry to control edge angle characteristics, while the bottom portion uses a mathematical function to control depth and curvature. This local differentiation allows each parameter to be optimized independently for aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If non-spherical dimple designs are used to control edge angle, then aerodynamic performance improves, but sharp demarcation lines appear between different portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidprofile continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The transition between the conical sidewall portion and the bottom portion is designed to be smooth and continuous, eliminating sharp demarcation lines. The conical portion transitions seamlessly into the bottom portion through carefully controlled geometry, ensuring profile continuity while maintaining the aerodynamic benefits of edge angle control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If dimple coverage is increased to improve flight distance, then aerodynamic performance improves, but tiny dimples are not effective turbulence generators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight distanceVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The dimple design changes the critical parameter of edge angle through the conical sidewall portion, allowing smaller dimples to maintain effectiveness as turbulence generators. The controlled edge angle ensures proper flow separation and turbulence generation even at reduced dimple sizes, enabling increased dimple coverage without sacrificing individual dimple effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances aerodynamic performance by optimizing dimple shape, reducing drag, and improving lift, while maintaining manufacturing feasibility and avoiding the limitations of spherical dimples.

Implementation Method 1

The dimples on the ball create a turbulent boundary layer around the ball, i.e., the air in a thin layer adjacent to the ball flows in a turbulent manner. The turbulence energizes the boundary layer and helps it stay attached further around the ball to reduce the area of the wake.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

This greatly increases the pressure behind the ball and substantially reduces the drag.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag reduction: Drag

Implementation Method 3

Lift is the upward force on the ball that is created from a difference in pressure on the top of the ball to the bottom of the ball. The difference in pressure is created by a warpage in the air flow resulting from the ball's back spin.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnus effect: Magnus Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10046203B2Golf ball dimple profile
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 ACUSHNET CO
  • US10046203B2 patent drawing
  • US10046203B2 patent drawing
  • US10046203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention concerns a golf ball having dimples with a cross-sectional profile comprising a conical top portion and a non-conical bottom portion. More particularly, the profiles of the present invention are defined by three independent parameters: dimple diameter (DD), edge angle (ΦEDGE), and saucer ratio (Sr). These parameters fully define the dimple shape and allow for greater flexibility in constructing a dimple profile versus conventional spherical dimples. Further, conical dimples provide a unique dimple cross-section which is visually distinct.