Golf Club Face Thickness Layout for MOI and COR Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf club heads face challenges in balancing mass and performance properties such as CG location, COR, and MOI while maintaining stress limits, appearance, and overall weight, particularly in iron-type clubs.

Innovation Solution

A variable face thickness pattern is implemented in golf club heads, redistributing discretionary mass from the striking face to other areas to improve CG location, increase MOI, and enhance COR, while maintaining similar stress limits and overall weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If mass is added to improve MOI and CG location, then forgiveness and stability improve, but club head weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMOIVSAvoidclub head weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The face thickness is varied locally across different regions of the striking face. The peripheral region has greater thickness than the central region, concentrating mass where it is needed to increase MOI and improve forgiveness, while avoiding uniform thickening that would increase overall weight. This localized mass distribution achieves the desired stability without sacrificing weight constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If face thickness is increased to improve structural strength, then stress resistance improves, but COR decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress resistanceVSAvoidCOR
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The face thickness is optimized locally, with the peripheral region having greater thickness for structural strength and stress resistance, while the central region maintains thinner construction to preserve COR. This differentiated thickness pattern allows the face to withstand stress at the periphery while maintaining energy transfer efficiency at the center where impact occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If CG is moved laterally to improve shot accuracy, then sweet spot alignment improves, but mass distribution complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesweet spot alignmentVSAvoidmass distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The face thickness is designed with asymmetric variation across the striking face. The peripheral region has greater thickness than the central region, creating an asymmetric mass distribution that naturally positions the CG in an optimal location for improved sweet spot alignment and shot accuracy, eliminating the need for complex asymmetric shaping or additional weighting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20250367513A1Golf club heads with variable face thickness
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20250367513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367513A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367513A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf club head includes a main body having a toe, a heel opposite the toe, a sole, and a top portion opposite the sole. The club head further includes a striking face or face insert with a central region including a face center, a first average thickness, and variable thickness. An upper region above the central region has a second average thickness less than the first average thickness and an upper groove having a width greater than 5.0 mm. A toe region toe-ward of the central region has a third average thickness less than the first average thickness and a toe side groove having a width greater than 2.0 mm. An intermediate region at least partially surrounds the central region between the central region and each of the upper region and the toe region. In one aspect, the intermediate region has a fourth average thickness greater than the first average thickness.