Golf Club Face Grooves With Inserts for Debris Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf club heads with grooves often struggle to effectively manage debris between the club face and the golf ball, leading to inconsistent ball-to-club contact, and existing manufacturing methods lack flexibility in designing grooves that meet regulatory standards while ensuring optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The golf club head incorporates channels with inserts that form grooves, allowing for customizable groove designs that meet USGA regulations, with the inserts being secured within the channels using adhesives or friction fits, enabling varied materials and configurations to enhance durability and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional grooves are used in golf club heads, then manufacturing is simpler, but debris management between club face and ball is ineffective leading to inconsistent contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of ball-to-club contactVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The groove is divided into multiple segments or zones along its length, with each zone having different characteristics (depth, width, orientation) to perform specific functions such as debris removal, water channeling, or spin generation. This segmentation allows optimized debris management while maintaining manufacturability through modular design approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The groove design incorporates dynamic elements that adapt to impact conditions, such as variable depth grooves that are deeper in certain zones to enhance debris removal during specific swing speeds or ball types, allowing the groove to function more effectively across varying playing conditions while using standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If grooves are designed to meet USGA regulations, then regulatory compliance is achieved, but manufacturing flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomizability of groove designVSAvoidmanufacturing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the groove have different local characteristics (varying depth, width, cross-sectional shape) that can be customized to meet specific performance requirements and USGA regulations simultaneously. For example, the groove may be wider at the opening to meet regulatory standards while being narrower at the bottom to optimize debris removal, with each zone manufactured using appropriate processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The groove design allows modification of key parameters such as depth, width, spacing, and cross-sectional shape to achieve compliance with USGA regulations while optimizing performance. These parameter variations can be implemented through adjustable manufacturing processes or by selecting from standardized groove profiles that meet different regulatory interpretations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If grooves are made deeper to improve debris channeling, then debris management improves, but groove durability decreases due to increased wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris management effectivenessVSAvoidgroove durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of simply increasing groove depth in one dimension, the design incorporates multi-dimensional features such as three-dimensional contouring, angled sidewalls, and integrated debris ejection channels that enhance debris removal efficiency without requiring excessive depth. This allows effective debris management while maintaining groove structural integrity and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The groove structure utilizes composite material approaches, such as combining different metal alloys or applying surface treatments and coatings to groove areas, to enhance both the debris channeling capability and wear resistance. Harder materials or protective coatings can be applied specifically to high-wear groove regions while maintaining the necessary depth for effective debris removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11857850B2Golf club head with grooves and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 KARSTEN MFG CORP
  • US11857850B2 patent drawing
  • US11857850B2 patent drawing
  • US11857850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of golf clubs with grooves and methods of manufacture thereof are described herein. In one embodiment of a golf club described herein, the golf club has a head with a body. The body has a strike face with channels and at least one insert located within at least one of the channels. At least one of the channels comprises a single groove, and the insert forms at least a portion of the single groove. At least one of the channels comprises an opening on the strike face that is narrower than a bottom of the at least one of the channels. Other embodiments and related methods are also disclosed herein.