Golf Club Head CG Optimization via Sole Mass Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fairway woods and hybrids in golf clubs face challenges in achieving a low center of gravity (CG) without compromising traditional external dimensions or aesthetics, as existing methods like reducing peak crown height or using dissimilar materials are either aesthetically undesirable or costly and complex.

Innovation Solution

A golf club head with a steel construction featuring a specific design and material distribution, including a variable face thickness profile, a crown biased thickened central portion, and a sole return, which maintains traditional dimensions while strategically locating the CG low within the club head, achieved through a combination of steel alloy components and weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the peak crown height of the golf club is reduced to lower the CG, then the center of gravity is lowered, but the golf club head becomes smaller volumetrically and less aesthetically pleasing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity locationVSAvoidpeak crown height
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating mass in specific regions of the club head rather than uniformly distributing it. The sole structure includes variable thickness regions and optional weight pockets that locally increase density at the bottom of the club head, thereby lowering the CG without reducing the overall crown height or visual appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the mass distribution strategy from vertical dimension (reducing crown height) to horizontal and depth dimensions. By creating a complex sole structure with variable thickness across the sole surface and optional weight pockets in specific locations, the design lowers the CG through strategic mass placement in the horizontal plane rather than compressing the vertical dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of moving object

If the striking face height is reduced to lower the CG, then the center of gravity is lowered, but the striking face becomes smaller and more difficult to hit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity locationVSAvoidstriking face height
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains full striking face height while lowering the CG by implementing local mass concentration in the sole region. The variable thickness sole design and optional weight pockets create localized density increases at the bottom of the club head, achieving CG reduction without compromising the vertical dimension of the striking face.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If dissimilar materials are used in the crown to manipulate the CG, then the center of gravity can be adjusted, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity locationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs homogeneity by using substantially the same material throughout the club head, including the sole structure. This eliminates the need for joining dissimilar materials while achieving CG control through geometric design. The entire club head can be manufactured as a single piece or with compatible materials that simplify the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves CG manipulation through parameter changes in the sole geometry rather than material changes. By varying the thickness of the sole in different regions and creating optional weight pockets, the design adjusts mass distribution and CG location while maintaining material consistency throughout the club head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If the crown thickness is reduced to lower the CG, then the center of gravity is lowered, but the structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity locationVSAvoidcrown structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating mass reduction in the sole region rather than the crown. The variable thickness sole design removes material from the bottom of the club head where it has minimal impact on structural integrity, while the crown maintains sufficient thickness and strength. Optional weight pockets in the sole further adjust CG without affecting crown strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240278089A1Golf club head
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 ACUSHNET CO
  • US20240278089A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278089A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278089A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf club head that is capable of improving the center of gravity (CG) location while maintaining traditional external dimensions of the golf club head is disclosed herein. Additionally, the golf club head with improved CG location may also have an improved striking face design that shifts the placement of the thickened central portion away from the center of the face.