Golf Club Head Miter Joint for Thin Titanium Face Brazing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current brazing methods for golf club heads, particularly for joining dissimilar materials like titanium and steel, face challenges such as complexity, cost, size limitations, and durability issues, especially in highly stressed regions, and require a more efficient and cost-effective solution.

Innovation Solution

A method using a nickel-based or copper-based filler material in a vacuum brazing furnace to create a miter joint with angles between 10 to 45 degrees, specifically for attaching a thin titanium face plate to a steel body, reducing machining complexity and improving joint strength and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a tongue-and-groove joint is used for brazing a face plate to a club body, then the joint strength is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to requiring precise fitment with high tolerances and tight corners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidjoint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is divided into two functional segments: a scarf joint portion that provides structural strength and a lap joint portion that provides alignment and brazing accessibility. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function rather than requiring the entire joint to satisfy all requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint transitions from a two-dimensional planar interface to a three-dimensional angled interface. The scarf portion is configured at an angle (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the face plate, creating a wedgelike structure that distributes stresses more effectively and provides mechanical interlocking in addition to brazing bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If a tongue-and-groove joint is used, then the joint strength is improved, but the manufacturing time and cost increase due to requiring tight corners and precise fitment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is divided into two functional segments: a scarf joint portion that provides structural strength and a lap joint portion that provides alignment and brazing accessibility. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function rather than requiring the entire joint to satisfy all requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint transitions from a two-dimensional planar interface to a three-dimensional angled interface. The scarf portion is configured at an angle (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the face plate, creating a wedgelike structure that distributes stresses more effectively and provides mechanical interlocking in addition to brazing bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If a tongue-and-groove joint is used, then the joint strength is improved, but the volume and weight increase making it impractical in thinner cross-sectional locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidjoint volume
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is divided into two functional segments: a scarf joint portion that provides structural strength and a lap joint portion that provides alignment and brazing accessibility. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function rather than requiring the entire joint to satisfy all requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint transitions from a two-dimensional planar interface to a three-dimensional angled interface. The scarf portion is configured at an angle (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the face plate, creating a wedgelike structure that distributes stresses more effectively and provides mechanical interlocking in addition to brazing bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If a tongue-and-groove joint with tight corners is used, then the joint strength is improved, but stress concentrations increase in highly stressed regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidstress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating tight corners that concentrate stress, the joint uses a scarf configuration with a gradual angle (e.g., 45 degrees) that distributes stress evenly across the joint interface. The lap portion provides a transition zone that eliminates sharp geometric discontinuities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The joint transitions from a two-dimensional planar interface to a three-dimensional angled interface. The scarf portion is configured at an angle (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the face plate, creating a wedgelike structure that distributes stresses more effectively and provides mechanical interlocking in addition to brazing bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

5Strength

If a larger width joint is used, then the joint strength is improved, but the locations where the joint can be implemented are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidjoint placement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is divided into two functional segments: a scarf joint portion that provides structural strength and a lap joint portion that provides alignment and brazing accessibility. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function rather than requiring the entire joint to satisfy all requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint transitions from a two-dimensional planar interface to a three-dimensional angled interface. The scarf portion is configured at an angle (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the face plate, creating a wedgelike structure that distributes stresses more effectively and provides mechanical interlocking in addition to brazing bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves a stronger, more durable joint with reduced manufacturing costs and increased flexibility in placement, especially in smaller cross-sectional areas, while minimizing stress concentrations and improving heat management.

Implementation Method 1

A method using a nickel-based or copper-based filler material in a vacuum brazing furnace to create a miter joint with angles between 10 to 45 degrees, specifically for attaching a thin titanium face plate to a steel body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrazing: Brazing

Data Source

PatentUS12157038B1Golf club head with miter joint for brazing
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 TOPGOLF CALLAWAY BRANDS CORP
  • US12157038B1 patent drawing
  • US12157038B1 patent drawing
  • US12157038B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf club head with a mitered joint for joining components of dissimilar materials is disclosed herein. The golf club head has a body with an internal edge defining a recess, and a face component having an internal edge. The face component is disposed over the recess. The internal edge of the body and the internal edge of the face have an angle ranging from 10 degrees to 45 degrees.