Golf Iron Center of Gravity Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sets of iron golf clubs have a constant center of gravity distribution, which limits the precision and variability of ball flight trajectories, as the loft angle increases, resulting in less distance and a steeper trajectory, failing to provide optimal performance across different iron types.

Innovation Solution

A set of golf clubs with progressively allocated center of gravity, where long irons have a center of gravity between 0 mm and 2.5 mm from the face center, mid-irons between 0 mm and 2.5 mm, and short irons between 3 mm and 4 mm, with heel and toe weights strategically positioned to optimize moment of inertia and loft angle, and a method of forming golf clubs involving forging, machining, and attaching weight members to create a progressive center of gravity distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a constant center of gravity distribution is used across all iron clubs, then manufacturing is simpler, but ball flight precision and trajectory variability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity distribution precisionVSAvoidball flight trajectory variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the center of gravity distribution specifically in the short irons (35-50 degrees loft) compared to long and mid irons. Weight members are strategically positioned in the heel or toe regions of short irons to achieve CG distances of 3-5mm from the face center, while long and mid irons maintain CG distances of 1-3mm. This localized differentiation enables precise control over ball flight trajectories for different club types without complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the center of gravity is positioned closer to the face center for all irons, then long iron performance is optimized, but short iron trajectory control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong iron performance consistencyVSAvoidshort iron trajectory control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by creating a progressive center of gravity allocation system where the CG distance from the face center varies by club type. Long irons (15-25 degrees loft) maintain CG distances of 1-3mm for penetrating trajectories, mid irons (26-36 degrees) use 1-3mm for balanced performance, and short irons (37-47 degrees) increase to 3-5mm for steeper trajectories. This dynamic adjustment across the set allows each club type to operate optimally for its intended function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If heel and toe weights are positioned farther from the face center, then moment of inertia increases for better stability, but the center of gravity distance becomes too large affecting ball flight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclub head stabilityVSAvoidcenter of gravity position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific quantitative ranges for center of gravity positioning based on loft angle. Long irons (15-25 degrees) maintain CG-X distances of 1-3mm, mid irons (26-36 degrees) use 1-3mm, and short irons (37-47 degrees) increase to 3-5mm. These parameter specifications allow weight members to be positioned optimally for both moment of inertia and trajectory control, with the understanding that higher loft clubs benefit from greater CG distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables more precise shots by varying the center of gravity distribution through the set, allowing for predictable ball flight distances and angles, improving performance across long, mid, and short irons.

Implementation Method 1

each golf club includes a shaft with a club head attached to one end and a grip attached to the other end. The club head includes a face for striking a golf ball. The angle between the face and a vertical plane is called 'loft.'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCenter of gravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

method of forming a golf club involving forging, machining, and attaching weight members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForging: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS9718119B2Method of forming an iron set
Publication Date: 2017.08.01 ACUSHNET CO
  • US9718119B2 patent drawing
  • US9718119B2 patent drawing
  • US9718119B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a set of golf clubs comprising long irons, mid-irons and short irons. The irons have a progressive horizontal CG location. Preferably, the long and MID irons have a CG located between about 1 mm and 3 mm towards the hosel and the short iron CG is located between about 3 mm and 4 mm toward the hosel. Further the irons can have a substantially constant blade width with progressively increasing toe height and progressively decreasing scoreline width.