Golf Iron Set Weight Distribution for Consistent Ball Flight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf clubs lack a progressive center of gravity allocation and structural support across the back surface of the faces, leading to inconsistent ball flight trajectories and performance characteristics across different irons.

Innovation Solution

A set of golf clubs with long, mid, and short irons featuring a progressive center of gravity distribution, where the center of gravity is positioned further away from the face center towards the hosel in short irons, and optimized weight distribution and moment of inertia, along with a constant blade length and varying toe height and scoreline width, to enhance shot precision and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional iron sets use uniform center of gravity positioning across all clubs, then manufacturing is simplified, but ball flight consistency and performance characteristics deteriorate across different irons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveball flight consistencyVSAvoidcenter of gravity allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning the center of gravity at different locations for different iron clubs within the set. Long irons have the center of gravity positioned differently compared to mid-irons and short irons, with each club type optimized for its specific performance requirements. This allows each club to have tailored performance characteristics while maintaining overall set consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by systematically varying the center of gravity position parameter across the iron set. The horizontal distance from the face center to the center of gravity is adjusted based on club type, creating a progressive allocation pattern that optimizes ball flight trajectories for each specific iron while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through a structured approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If structural support across the back surface of the face is not optimized, then manufacturing is easier, but shot accuracy and precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshot accuracyVSAvoidstructural support complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the back surface of the iron face into multiple support regions with different structural characteristics. The structure is segmented to provide optimized support at specific locations, allowing each region to contribute differently to overall shot accuracy and precision while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular construction approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11883723B2Supported iron set
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 ACUSHNET CO
  • US11883723B2 patent drawing
  • US11883723B2 patent drawing
  • US11883723B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a set of golf clubs comprising long irons, mid irons and short irons. Preferably, the long and mid irons have a face stabilizing bar and back panel that have a plurality of apertures in the face stabilizing bar and/or the back wall.