Golf Match Tracking System Using Handicap-Based Stroke Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for tracking golf matches are inefficient, inaccurate, and lack user-friendly features, relying on paper scorecards or inadequate electronic solutions.

Innovation Solution

A match tracking system with a graphical user interface that allows users to create, manage, and store golf match information, including course details, player handicaps, and scores, using a software component executable on computing devices, enabling efficient and accurate tracking through modules for match creation, score entry, and report generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If paper scorecards are used for manual tracking, then no special equipment is required, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematch tracking efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for scorekeeping
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual paper scorekeeping with an electronic computing system that automatically calculates scores, handicaps, and match results. The processing device executes software components that perform calculations and generate reports electronically, eliminating the need for manual arithmetic and paper-based tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service match tracking where participants can independently input their own scores and the system automatically processes the data. The electronic scorecard allows players to record scores without requiring another player to manually calculate and tabulate results, making the tracking process self-sufficient and immediate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual paper scorecards are used, then device complexity is minimal, but measurement precision and accuracy of score tracking deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescore tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces error-prone manual calculations with automated electronic computing that precisely calculates scores, handicaps, and match outcomes. The processing device performs exact arithmetic operations and data processing that eliminate human calculation errors, providing superior measurement precision despite increased electronic system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If conventional electronic solutions are used, then efficiency improves compared to paper methods, but usability and user-friendly features deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-friendlinessVSAvoidmatch tracking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal electronic scorecard system that combines multiple functions into a single interface: score input, handicap calculation, match scoring, result tabulation, and report generation. This multi-functional approach improves ease of operation by consolidating tasks while maintaining high productivity through automated processing of all these functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex manual procedures with simplified electronic interactions. Players interact through intuitive digital interfaces rather than complex paper forms and calculations, improving ease of operation while the automated backend maintains high processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If paper scorecards are used, then data storage is simple, but information management and reconciliation become inaccurate and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata management reliabilityVSAvoiddata storage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical paper storage with electronic data storage and management systems. The processing device stores match data, scores, and results in digital format, enabling reliable data management, easy retrieval, and automatic reconciliation without the errors and difficulties of manual paper-based information management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10967241B2Golf match creation and tracking
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 FABFOREDEV INC
  • US10967241B2 patent drawing
  • US10967241B2 patent drawing
  • US10967241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A match creation and management method and system are described, according to various implementations. In an implementation, a match is customized based on match information in response to a first selection from a user device. In response to a second selection from the user device, a match profile is configured associated with a plurality of players. For each of the plurality of players, a golf handicap index may be retrieved (e.g., from a third party source), where the golf handicap index is associated with each of the plurality of players. The golf handicap index may then be used at least in part to calculate a course handicap associated with each of the plurality of players. The course handicap may be used to allocate a plurality of stroke holes for each of the plurality of players. An electronic match scorecard may be generated comprising at least in part a plurality of scores associated with the plurality of players and the match information, wherein the electronic match scorecard is displayed within a first interface of the user device.