Golf Swing Analysis Using Six Rotational Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing golf swings lack a comprehensive understanding of key parameters throughout the swing duration, failing to provide effective feedback for improving power generation and reducing injury.

Innovation Solution

Measuring and calculating key parameters such as peak X-factor, X-factor at impact, peak S-factor, S-factor at impact, peak O-factor, and O-factor at impact, along with additional parameters like clubhead speed and rotational velocities, to provide targeted feedback for optimizing the golf swing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive measurement of multiple swing parameters is implemented, then power generation analysis accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation analysis accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The golf swing analysis system divides the complex swing motion into six distinct rotational parameters (X-factor, S-factor, O-factor at peak and at impact) that can be measured and analyzed separately. Each parameter represents a specific aspect of swing mechanics, allowing comprehensive analysis while maintaining manageable measurement components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system is designed to capture multiple swing parameters simultaneously using a unified approach. The system measures pelvic and shoulder rotations, clubhead speed, and impact timing across all six parameters using consistent measurement techniques, reducing overall system complexity while achieving comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If multiple swing parameters are measured simultaneously, then feedback comprehensiveness is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines measurements of pelvic rotation, shoulder rotation, clubhead speed, and impact timing into a unified set of six rotational parameters. By merging these different measurement types into a consistent parameter framework, the system achieves comprehensive feedback while simplifying data processing through standardized analysis methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw motion data into six specific rotational parameters (X-factor, S-factor, O-factor at peak and impact) that directly relate to power generation. This parameter transformation approach converts complex multi-dimensional motion data into manageable metrics that are easier to process and provide actionable feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If detailed biomechanical analysis is performed throughout swing duration, then performance optimization is improved, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies six key parameters (X-factor, S-factor, O-factor at peak and at impact) that are most relevant to power generation before measurement begins. By determining these critical parameters in advance, the measurement system can focus resources on capturing specific swing characteristics rather than attempting to measure all possible motion variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement approach focuses on specific critical moments in the swing (peak rotation and impact) rather than attempting continuous detailed analysis throughout the entire swing duration. This localized measurement strategy captures the most important biomechanical events while reducing overall measurement complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9656121B2Methods for analyzing and providing feedback for improved power generation in a golf swing
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US9656121B2 patent drawing
  • US9656121B2 patent drawing
  • US9656121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to methods for optimizing a golf swing by measuring and providing feedback on a combination of various key parameters of a subject's movement to both generate more power and reduce injury.