Golf Training Plate with Alignment Tab and Stopper Bumps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf training devices are cumbersome, expensive to manufacture, and inconvenient to use, which discourages participation, especially among younger players, as they require significant time and effort to set up for practice, leading to a decline in golf industry participation.

Innovation Solution

A simple, 3D printed or molded plastic plate with a golf ball seat and stopper bumps for easy ball placement, alignment tabs for square clubface positioning, and tee holes for securing the trainer to the surface, allowing for efficient and effective putting and driving practice.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional golf training devices are used, then training effectiveness can be improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential functional elements needed for golf training (ball positioning, alignment reference, securing mechanism) and eliminates all non-essential components. The training device uses a simple base with minimal features: a ball seat, alignment tab, and tee holes, removing complex mechanisms while preserving core training functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs inexpensive materials such as molded or 3D-printed plastic for the training device components. The design accepts that the device may wear or become damaged over time but compensates by making replacement extremely affordable and simple, prioritizing low initial cost and ease of replacement over long-term durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional golf training devices are used, then training functionality can be improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining functionalityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the training device to perform multiple training functions using a single simple structure. The same base unit with ball seat and alignment tab serves for both putting practice (with golf balls) and driving practice (with tennis balls or golf balls), eliminating the need for separate specialized devices for different shot types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves versatility through parameter changes rather than structural complexity. By adjusting the ball type (golf ball vs. tennis ball), the user can switch between putting and driving practice modes. The alignment tab and tee hole configuration remain constant while adapting to different training needs through simple parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional golf training devices are used, then alignment precision can be improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates pre-positioned alignment features directly into the device structure. The alignment tab is permanently positioned on the base to indicate the correct putter or clubface orientation, and the tee holes are pre-drilled at specific locations to ensure proper ball placement and directional alignment, eliminating the need for users to manually set up alignment references during each practice session.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The training device provides self-alignment through its built-in geometric features. When the ball is placed in the ball seat and secured with tees in the designated holes, the alignment tab automatically indicates the correct clubface orientation without requiring user measurement or adjustment. The device serves its own alignment function through its inherent structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If conventional golf training devices are used, then training capability can be improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining capabilityVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the training device into simple, separable components: a base unit, removable tees, and interchangeable ball types. This segmentation allows users to quickly assemble and disassemble the device for different training scenarios without complex setup procedures, reducing time loss while maintaining comprehensive training capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10695642B1Golf training systems, devices, methods, and components
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 GROTH ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US10695642B1 patent drawing
  • US10695642B1 patent drawing
  • US10695642B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf training assembly has a plate structure configured for placement on a golf surface, such as a putting green. The training assembly has a mouth for receiving a rolling golf ball. The mouth guides the golf ball against a stop member for stopping and holding the golf ball in place allowing a golfer to practice putting.