GPGPU Carrier Tool-Less Installation Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for installing and removing general purpose graphic processing units (GPGPUs) in computer systems are cumbersome, requiring tools and often result in data transfer errors due to fragile cables and sockets, and pose significant challenges in data centers with multiple high-capacity GPGPUs, necessitating a solution for easy, quick, and efficient installation and removal.

Innovation Solution

A compact, tool-less GPGPU carrier design with a bracket and frame that includes locking mechanisms and guide slots, allowing for secure attachment and adjustment within a slot, enabling easy installation and removal without damaging the GPGPU or connectors, and allowing for space savings by combining multiple components in a single carrier.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cable sockets and cables are used to connect GPGPUs, then data transfer connections are established, but the cables and sockets become frail over time and introduce data transfer errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer reliabilityVSAvoidcable and socket lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the cable and socket components from the connection system, replacing them with a direct mechanical interface between the GPGPU carrier and motherboard slot. This eliminates the intermediate cable assembly that degrades over time, thereby improving reliability while removing the lifespan limitation of traditional cable-based connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If tools are required to install and remove GPGPUs, then secure attachment is achieved, but the installation process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the attachment function into two independent mechanisms: guide slots for precise alignment and positioning, and locking mechanisms for secure attachment. This segmentation allows the locking mechanism to provide strong attachment while being operable by simple manual action, eliminating the need for tools and reducing installation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a carrier as an intermediary component between the GPGPU and the motherboard slot. The carrier incorporates both guide slots and locking mechanisms, mediating the connection process to provide both secure attachment and tool-less operation, thereby resolving the contradiction between attachment strength and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple GPGPUs are installed in a data center, then computational capacity increases, but the time and skills required for removal and installation become burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capacityVSAvoidinstallation and removal time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the GPGPU installation system into standardized carriers with integrated guide slots and locking mechanisms. This standardization allows multiple GPGPUs to be installed using the same simple procedure, reducing the skill requirement and time per installation, thereby enabling data centers to scale computational capacity without proportionally increasing installation burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of GPGPU installation from tool-based mechanical fastening to tool-less locking mechanism operation. This parameter change reduces both the time required and the skill level needed for installation and removal, allowing data centers to efficiently manage multiple high-capacity GPGPUs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a slot geometry does not match the processor carrier geometry, then secure attachment is impossible, but adding complex adjustment mechanisms increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidslot and carrier geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric guide slot geometry in the carrier that corresponds to the asymmetric shape of the GPGPU. This asymmetric design provides inherent geometric compatibility, ensuring secure attachment through shape complementarity without requiring complex adjustment mechanisms, thereby maintaining low device complexity while achieving reliable attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3483698B1Housing for a processor
Publication Date: 2019.10.09 QUANTA COMPUTER INC
  • EP3483698B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3483698B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3483698B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computing device is provided with a slot that includes a first locking element and a second locking element configured to receive a removable general purpose graphic processing unit (GPGPU) carrier. The GPGPU carrier includes a bracket for securing a first GPGPU in a first receiving space, and second GPGPU in a second receiving space. The bracket also includes a first latching mechanism configured to secure the first locking element of the slot, and a second latching mechanism configured to secure the second locking element of the slot. The GPGPU carrier also includes a frame secured to the bracket. The frame includes a first end with a first guide slot, and a second end with a second guide slot, configured to secure the GPGPU carrier within the slot. The first and second guide slots are configured to enable the GPGPU carrier to adjust from a first position to a second position while secured within the slot.