GPRS Support Node Capacity Planning Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual capacity planning in wireless networks is labor-intensive and non-optimal, particularly for large networks, as it involves balancing multiple factors such as load balancing, capital costs, and user behavior, without a systematic approach to optimize network performance.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for planning serving General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) support nodes in wireless networks that determine optimal parameters based on input data and penalty factors, using an objective function to minimize penalties related to load balancing, handover traffic, and capital costs, while considering geographical clustering and user behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual capacity planning is used to manage network elements, then flexibility in adjusting parameters is maintained, but labor intensity increases and planning optimality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual parameter adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidplanning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically gathering network data, evaluating multiple factors (load balancing, capital cost, user behavior), and generating capacity planning recommendations without requiring manual intervention. The processor autonomously executes the capacity planning algorithm and presents optimized results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of parameter adjustment is replaced with an automated computational system. The processor substitutes human planners by executing algorithms that evaluate network data and generate planning recommendations, transforming a labor-intensive manual process into an automated electronic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual capacity planning is used for large networks, then detailed parameter control is possible, but the planning becomes highly non-optimal and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter control precisionVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous capacity planning by automatically and continuously gathering network data from multiple sources, evaluating factors without interruption, and generating updated planning recommendations. This continuous automated process eliminates the time loss associated with periodic manual planning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The time-consuming manual evaluation of multiple factors is replaced by an automated computational system that simultaneously processes network data, load balancing requirements, capital cost constraints, and user behavior patterns, delivering optimized planning results in minimal time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple factors are considered in capacity planning, then comprehensive optimization is achieved, but the complexity of the planning process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performance optimizationVSAvoidplanning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs multiple functions within a single integrated process: gathering network data, evaluating load balancing requirements, assessing capital cost constraints, analyzing user behavior patterns, and generating capacity planning recommendations. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive optimization without increasing apparent process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary that receives multiple input factors (network data, load balancing requirements, capital cost constraints, user behavior), processes them through a unified algorithm, and produces integrated planning recommendations. This intermediary approach manages complexity by centralizing the evaluation of multiple factors through a single computational system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8913497B2Method and apparatus for planning serving general packet radio service support nodes in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2014.12.16 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8913497B2 patent drawing
  • US8913497B2 patent drawing
  • US8913497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for providing planning of a plurality of serving general packet radio service support nodes in a wireless network are disclosed. For example, the method obtains input data, and determines a limit for at least one serving general packet radio service support node parameter in accordance with the input data. The method determines if the limit for the at least one serving general packet radio service support node parameter is exceeded and determines an optimal output for an objective function, wherein the objective function is based on a plurality of penalty factors, if the limit for the at least one serving general packet radio service support node parameter is exceeded.