GPS Hazard Detector with Location-Specific Alerting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency broadcast systems are indiscriminate and lack real-time location-specific alerts, often causing public panic and failing to provide relevant information or support during natural disasters, as they require constant access to electronic media and rely on central broadcasting without individual interaction or location-based updates.

Innovation Solution

A hazard detection and alert device equipped with geolocation means (like GPS or cellular triangulation) to identify its location, communicate with a remote system for hazard alerts, and provide perceptible alerts through various means (speakers, LEDs, etc.) to individuals in proximity, allowing for accurate and timely warnings based on their specific location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If emergency broadcast systems are used to provide hazard alerts, then individuals can receive early warning of natural disasters, but the alerts are indiscriminate and cause public panic in areas not affected by the hazard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of hazard alertVSAvoidpublic panic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making alert delivery location-specific. The system determines the geographic location of each hazard detector and selectively transmits alerts only to detectors within the affected area. This ensures that individuals in non-affected areas do not receive false alerts, eliminating public panic while maintaining reliable hazard warning for those actually at risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the broadcast audience by geographic location. Instead of sending a single broadcast to all receivers, the system divides the population into segments based on their location relative to the hazard, sending alerts only to the relevant segment. This segmentation approach maintains alert reliability for affected areas while avoiding unnecessary alerts to unaffected areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If central broadcasting systems are used to transmit hazard alerts, then information can be disseminated to a large audience, but the system lacks real-time updates and individual interaction capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of individuals reachedVSAvoidreal-time updates and interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by enabling two-way communication between hazard detectors and the remote system. Detectors can send status information and receive real-time alert updates, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions. This feedback mechanism provides both real-time updates and interaction capabilities while maintaining the ability to reach large numbers of individuals through the distributed detector network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the alert system adaptive and flexible. The system can dynamically update alerts based on real-time hazard information and can interact with individual detectors to provide customized information. This dynamic approach allows the system to serve large audiences while maintaining adaptability and real-time responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If electronic media devices are required to receive emergency broadcasts, then alerts can be transmitted through multiple channels, but individuals without constant access to these devices cannot receive warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of alert deliveryVSAvoidaccessibility to alert system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by making the hazard detector autonomous. The detector automatically determines its location, receives alerts from the remote system, and provides local alerts without requiring user interaction with electronic media devices. This self-service approach expands coverage to all individuals with detectors while maintaining ease of operation, as the system works automatically without requiring users to actively engage with broadcast devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the hazard detector as an intermediary device between the central broadcast system and the individual. The detector receives broadcast information and translates it into local alerts that individuals can perceive directly, eliminating the need for them to constantly monitor electronic media devices. This intermediary approach improves both coverage and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9721457B2Global positioning system equipped with hazard detector and a system for providing hazard alerts thereby
Publication Date: 2017.08.01 THOMPSON JONATHAN
  • US9721457B2 patent drawing
  • US9721457B2 patent drawing
  • US9721457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to detectors of hazardous environmental conditions (e.g., smoke, gas, motion). Specifically, the invention relates to a hazard detector configured to transmit and/or receive information related to hazardous environmental conditions based at least in part on the location of the hazard detector as identified through one or more location based service means (e.g., global positioning systems (GPS), cellular triangulation, Internet IP geolocation).