GPS In-Band Interference Mitigation via Deterministic Phase Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing GPS signal reception technologies are inadequate in mitigating in-band interference, particularly spoofing and jamming, which can disrupt critical navigation and communication systems, due to their reliance on complex hardware, directional antennas, and limited angular operating range, making them unsuitable for widespread use.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of phase-controlled filtering using omnidirectional antennas and modifying circuitry that includes detectors, amplifiers, phase shifters, and combiners to selectively cancel interference by amplitude equalizing and phase shifting signals, allowing for enhanced GPS signal reception without the need for directional antennas or extensive spatial diversity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If array steering is used to reduce receiver sensitivity in the direction of jamming source, then interference mitigation is improved, but hardware complexity, size, weight, power consumption, and cost increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigationVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the interference signal from the composite received signal by detecting its characteristics (frequency, amplitude, phase) and separately processing it through a null generator, rather than using complex array steering hardware. This separates the interference cancellation function from the main signal reception path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a null generator as an intermediary device that creates a cancellation signal based on detected interference characteristics. This mediator processes the interference separately and combines it with the original signal to achieve cancellation without requiring complex array hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If array steering is used to reduce receiver sensitivity to interference, then interference mitigation is improved, but the payload capacity and energy requirements increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigationVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting interference characteristics and generating appropriate cancellation signals without requiring external control or complex hardware reconfiguration. The null generator adapts to interference conditions in real-time using minimal power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from physically steering antenna arrays (which requires substantial power) to electronically generating cancellation signals by modifying signal parameters (amplitude, phase, frequency) to match and cancel the interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional filtering is used to reject frequencies outside desirable range, then signal to noise ratio is improved, but interference at passband frequencies cannot be mitigated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal to noise ratioVSAvoidinterference mitigation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary detection of interference characteristics (frequency, amplitude, phase) before generating the cancellation signal. This preliminary action allows the system to prepare the appropriate null signal in advance, enabling effective cancellation of passband interference that conventional filters cannot handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If spatial diversity with directional antennas is used to defeat interference, then interference mitigation is improved, but signal quality from directions proximate to interference degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference mitigationVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a targeted cancellation signal that specifically addresses the interference from a particular direction or frequency, while leaving the desired signal from other directions unaffected. The null generator adjusts the cancellation signal's characteristics to match only the interference components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Device complexity

If fewer array elements are used to reduce system complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but the null broadens and cancels SI over wide ranges of bearing reducing overall system performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of array elementsVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical array steering system with an electronic signal processing approach. Instead of physically positioning multiple antenna elements to create narrow nulls, the system uses electronic generation of cancellation signals that can achieve precise interference rejection with minimal hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively cancels interference at any bearing, including boresight interference, while maintaining signal quality, reducing system complexity and cost, and enabling operation in compact, aerodynamic configurations, thus enhancing GPS signal-to-noise ratio and overall system performance.

Implementation Method 1

modifying circuitry that can modify signals from the second antenna... Phase shifting is conducted according to a deterministic solution providing anti-phase alignment of desirably mitigated signals at the combiner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase shifting:

Implementation Method 2

a combiner, and a controller... combining modified signals to selectively cancel interference content

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal combining:

Implementation Method 3

an emitter antenna of any type that can emit a modified second antenna signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation:

Data Source

PatentUS9519062B2Methods, systems, and computer readable media for mitigation of in-band interference of global positioning system (GPS) signals
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 ARCHAIUS INC
  • US9519062B2 patent drawing
  • US9519062B2 patent drawing
  • US9519062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer readable media for mitigation of interference of GPS signals are disclosed providing selective mitigation of in-band interference implementing deterministic phase control. In one embodiment, a system for mitigating interference of GPS signals includes a pair of antennas, each receiving GPS signals that include both a desired signal component and a jammer signal component. The signal from one antenna is phase-shifted as needed to make it anti-phase with the signal from the other antenna, so that when the two signals are combined, the jammer signal components substantially cancel each other, leaving the desired signal components. Determining the phase shift required involves deterministically calculating the phase shift based on the amplitudes of the two input signals and the amplitude of the combined signal instead of the iterative techniques used in conventional systems.