Frequent Stop Location Identification via GPS Event Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle tracking systems lack the ability to automatically identify frequent stop locations based on GPS data, which are crucial for optimizing routes and managing vehicle fleets effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that receives and analyzes GPS event data to determine vehicle stops, identifies frequent stop locations by meeting a threshold number of stops within a defined area, and defines these areas using geographic criteria, enabling automated identification and recording of such locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If GPS data is collected and stored for analysis, then the ability to identify frequent stop locations is improved, but the data storage requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracy of frequent stop locationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments GPS data into discrete stop events by analyzing changes in location and duration. Each stop is recorded as a separate event with specific parameters (location, start time, end time, duration), allowing the system to process and analyze stop patterns without handling the entire continuous GPS trajectory as a single complex data structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and processing of GPS data to identify and extract stop events before performing the frequent location analysis. By pre-processing the data to isolate only the relevant stop information, the system reduces the complexity of subsequent analysis while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated identification of frequent stop locations is implemented, then route optimization capability is improved, but the computational processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimization efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational processing power
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies a threshold criterion to identify frequent stop locations, focusing computational resources only on locations that meet the minimum frequency threshold. Instead of analyzing every possible location equally, the system processes only those GPS stops that satisfy the predefined frequency criterion, reducing overall computational requirements while maintaining optimization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of analysis from continuous GPS coordinates to discrete stop events characterized by location, duration, and frequency parameters. By transforming the data into stop event records with aggregated frequency information, the system enables more efficient computational processing for route optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8626419B2System and method for automated identification of frequent stop locations for vehicle fleets
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 VERIZON CONNECT DEVELOPMENT LTD
  • US8626419B2 patent drawing
  • US8626419B2 patent drawing
  • US8626419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method and system flow for processing GPS event data to identify frequent stop location in accord with embodiments as described herein. The method comprises identifying a stop location for a vehicle. The method comprises recording vehicle stops for an entity associated with the vehicle over a predetermined period of time. For example, stops are collected or processed for a predetermined time period. If the number of stops meets the threshold number of stops, the area is identified as a frequent stop location.