Dynamic GPU Resource Allocation With Time-Series Bin Packing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resource allocation methods in computing environments, particularly for GPUs, struggle to adapt to fluctuating demands, leading to inefficiencies, increased costs, and reduced performance due to underutilization or bottlenecks, without mechanisms to predict future resource requirements.

Innovation Solution

A Time Series Dynamic Programming Bin Packing (TS-DPBP) method that integrates temporal considerations into resource allocation, using dynamic programming and time-series predictive analytics to forecast future demands and adjust allocations proactively, optimizing GPU utilization and minimizing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If static bin packing algorithms are used for resource allocation, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing workload demands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to changing workload demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static resource allocation into a dynamic system that continuously adapts to changing workload demands. The bin packing algorithm is enhanced with real-time monitoring and reassignment capabilities, allowing resources to be dynamically reallocated based on current system state and predicted future demands, thus resolving the contradiction between implementation simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future workload demands using time-series analysis and proactively adjusting resource allocations before actual demand changes occur. This predictive capability allows the system to maintain simplicity while improving adaptability, as allocations are optimized in advance rather than reacting to changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If resources are allocated without predictive mechanisms, then allocation speed is maintained, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation speedVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses time-series predictive analysis to perform preliminary actions by forecasting future workload demands and pre-adjusting resource allocations accordingly. This allows the system to maintain fast allocation speeds while significantly improving resource utilization efficiency, as resources are proactively positioned to meet anticipated demands rather than reacting to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If excessive resources are allocated to tasks, then service reliability is improved, but resource waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice reliabilityVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor actual workload demands and compare them with allocated resources. Based on this feedback and predictive analytics, the system dynamically adjusts allocations to match actual needs, ensuring service reliability is maintained while eliminating resource waste from over-provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes allocation parameters based on predicted workload characteristics and system state. By adjusting resource allocation parameters in real-time according to actual and predicted demands, the system maintains service reliability while optimizing resource utilization and reducing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If insufficient resources are allocated to tasks, then resource efficiency is improved, but system performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary resource allocation based on predicted workload demands, ensuring sufficient resources are available before tasks begin. By using time-series analysis to forecast demands and proactively allocating appropriate resources, the system maintains high resource efficiency while preventing performance degradation from resource shortages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to continuously monitor task performance and resource utilization. When performance degradation is detected or predicted, the system dynamically increases allocations to maintain service levels while minimizing resource waste through precise, demand-based provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260044384A1Method and system for dynamically optimizing resource allocation in a computational environment
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 PROPHETSTOR DATA SERVICES
  • US20260044384A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044384A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044384A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for dynamically optimizing resource allocation in a computational environment and a system thereof includes the steps of: collecting current state data of resources; calculating minimum computing power required to satisfy all workloads over time based on the state data transition using dynamic programming; generating an allocation table to represent workloads across time slots for each resource, based on the collected current state data and the calculated minimum computing power; determining whether to allocate a predicted workload within current allocation across various time slots or to reallocate workloads over an extended number of time slots to fulfill future resource demand of the predicted workload, based on which option requires less additional computing power; and dynamically adjusting resource allocations across the time slots based on the allocation decision of the predicted workload and the future resource demands of the predicted workload to optimize resource efficiency and minimize operational costs.