GPU Performance Analysis via Core Model Stall Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

State-of-the-art GPUs experience significant performance degradation due to core-side stall events caused by limited functional units, memory structural stalls from shared L1 data cache banks, data memory stalls from sectored L1 caches, and load imbalance between and within cores.

Innovation Solution

A graphics processor performance analysis apparatus and method based on a graphics processor analytical model that accurately captures stall events by defining a graphics processor core model, simulating GPU operations, and analyzing performance to identify structural, memory, and idle stalls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the GPU core divides computing resources into sub-cores with limited functional units, then the GPU can handle more concurrent warps, but compute structural stalls increase due to insufficient functional units per sub-core

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent warp handling capabilityVSAvoidcompute structural stall cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The GPU core is segmented into multiple sub-cores, each with its own warp scheduler and limited functional units. This segmentation allows the system to handle more concurrent warps overall while distributing the computational load across multiple smaller units, preventing any single bottleneck from stalling the entire core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The warp scheduler dynamically selects which warps to issue to functional units based on current availability and readiness. This dynamic scheduling optimizes the utilization of limited functional units across sub-cores, minimizing idle cycles and reducing compute structural stalls by adaptively matching warp execution demands with available computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If a per-core L1 data cache with limited banks is shared by sub-cores, then memory capacity is optimized, but memory structural stalls increase due to bank contention

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveL1 data cache capacityVSAvoidmemory structural stall cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sub-cores share a common per-core L1 data cache structure, consolidating memory capacity resources. This merging allows efficient utilization of the cache while the cache's internal bank structure provides parallel access paths that reduce contention effects when multiple sub-cores simultaneously access memory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The L1 data cache is divided into multiple banks that can operate independently and in parallel. This segmentation of the cache structure allows multiple sub-cores to access different banks simultaneously, reducing bank contention and memory structural stalls while maintaining optimized cache capacity across the core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If sectored L1 data cache is used to divide cache lines into smaller sectors, then memory access granularity is improved, but data memory stalls increase due to sector-level contention in L2 cache

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory access granularityVSAvoiddata memory stall cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The L1 data cache divides each cache line into multiple smaller sectors, enabling fine-grained memory access. This segmentation allows sub-cores to access only the specific sectors they need rather than entire cache lines, improving memory access granularity and reducing unnecessary data transfer while the sector management structure coordinates access to prevent L2 cache contention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If the GPU has a large number of cores and sub-cores, then computational throughput is enhanced, but load imbalance between cores and sub-cores causes frequent idle stalls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational throughputVSAvoididle stall cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The warp scheduler dynamically allocates warps to sub-cores and adjusts scheduling decisions based on current load conditions and sub-core utilization. This dynamic load balancing mechanism continuously monitors and redistributes computational tasks to maintain even workload distribution across the large number of cores and sub-cores, minimizing idle stalls while preserving high computational throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system uses feedback from sub-core execution status and load conditions to adjust warp allocation decisions. By monitoring which sub-cores are underutilized or stalled, the system can dynamically redirect warps to balance the load across all computational units, reducing idle stalls caused by load imbalance while maintaining high overall throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12223561B2Apparatus and method for analyzing graphics processor performance based on graphics processor analytical model
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUND YONSEI UNIV
  • US12223561B2 patent drawing
  • US12223561B2 patent drawing
  • US12223561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a graphics processor performance analysis apparatus. The apparatus includes a model definition unit that defines a graphics processor core model for identifying structural stalls of computing and a memory, a data stall of the memory, and an idle stall, a simulation execution unit that simulates an operation of a specific GPU by using architecture parameters of a GPU application and the specific GPU as inputs on the basis of the graphics processor core model, and a performance analysis unit that receives an output of the graphics processor core model as a result of the simulation and analyzes performance of the specific GPU.