GPU Frame Rendering with Time-Based Resolution Downsampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In digital video editing, frames are not rendered quickly enough at original resolution, leading to bottlenecks in CPU load and user interaction delays, particularly during scrubbing operations, where rapid updates are required.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a time-based downsampling method where a downsampling factor is determined and applied if rendering exceeds a threshold, reducing image resolution and storing downsampled images in GPU memory for rapid display, allowing for fluid user interaction by maintaining the downsampling factor until rendering meets the time threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If images are rendered at original resolution, then image quality is maintained, but rendering speed decreases causing delays in user interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidrendering speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the image resolution based on rendering time feedback. When rendering exceeds the threshold time, the system automatically reduces resolution; when rendering is fast enough, it restores original resolution. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making resolution flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the resolution parameter of images based on rendering performance. By monitoring rendering time and adjusting the resolution parameter accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between image quality and rendering speed, directly addressing the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If downsampling is applied to improve rendering speed, then user interaction responsiveness improves, but image quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction responsivenessVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The downsampling factor is dynamically adjusted based on real-time rendering performance monitoring. The system applies downsampling only when necessary (when rendering time exceeds threshold) and maintains original quality when performance is sufficient, making the quality-speed tradeoff adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resolution parameter is changed conditionally based on rendering time measurements. The system modifies the resolution parameter only when performance metrics indicate it's necessary, preserving image quality as the default state while allowing degradation only when needed for responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If high resolution images are continuously rendered, then visual fidelity is maintained, but CPU and GPU load increases causing bottlenecks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual fidelityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial downsampling rather than full resolution rendering when performance thresholds are exceeded. This partial action maintains sufficient visual fidelity for the task at hand while reducing the excessive computational load that causes system bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The resolution parameter is adjusted based on system performance metrics, allowing the system to operate at different throughput levels. When CPU/GPU load becomes excessive, the parameter change reduces processing demands while maintaining acceptable visual output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If rendering time threshold is set low for responsive interaction, then user experience improves, but more frequent downsampling occurs reducing overall image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction delayVSAvoidoverall image quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from rendering time measurements to control the downsampling decision. The threshold acts as a feedback mechanism that triggers quality adjustment only when necessary, creating a closed-loop system that balances responsiveness and quality based on actual performance conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8547378B2Time-based degradation of images using a GPU
Publication Date: 2013.10.01 ADOBE INC
  • US8547378B2 patent drawing
  • US8547378B2 patent drawing
  • US8547378B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer-readable storage medium are disclosed for time-based degradation of images. In one embodiment, the rendering of a first frame of a digital video using a GPU may be initiated. In one embodiment, it may be determined that a time elapsed in rendering the first frame exceeds a threshold. In one embodiment, a downsampling factor may be determined in response to determining that the time elapsed exceeds the threshold. In one embodiment, a second frame of the digital video comprising a second set of one or more images may be rendered based on the downsampling factor using the GPU. Rendering the second frame based on the downsampling factor may comprise sending each of the second set of images to the GPU at a reduced resolution comprising a respective original resolution for each image divided by the downsampling factor.