GPU-Accelerated Video Encoder Task Partitioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video encoding technologies are inefficient for real-time video streaming and high-quality video processing, particularly due to high computational complexity and resource-intensive motion estimation methods, which are not optimized for personal computers, leading to suboptimal speed and quality in video processing.

Innovation Solution

A software-based video encoder that partitions video processing tasks between a graphics processing unit (GPU) and a central processing unit (CPU), allowing for configurable modes that reduce processing time, CPU cycles, latency, and enabling efficient encoding by utilizing GPU acceleration for motion estimation and parallel processing techniques such as coarse search and spatial filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional motion estimation methods are used, then video quality can be maintained, but processing time increases significantly and real-time encoding becomes unachievable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding speedVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides motion estimation into multiple stages: a coarse search stage that identifies candidate motion vectors and a refinement stage that selects the optimal one. This segmentation allows the system to perform initial processing quickly while reserving computational resources for only the necessary refinement operations, thereby achieving real-time encoding without sacrificing quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary actions by first performing a coarse search to establish candidate motion vectors before performing the more computationally intensive refinement process. This preliminary step filters out obviously incorrect candidates, reducing the workload for subsequent refinement operations and enabling real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If brute force computations are performed for motion estimation, then encoding accuracy improves, but CPU cycle consumption increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding accuracyVSAvoidCPU cycle consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different levels of computational quality to different parts of the motion estimation process. The coarse search uses lighter computational operations to process all macroblocks, while the refinement stage applies more intensive computations only to the most promising candidates. This local differentiation of quality ensures high accuracy where needed while conserving CPU resources overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial motion estimation by conducting a coarse search that examines a subset of possible motion vectors rather than exhaustively checking all possibilities. This partial action provides sufficient accuracy for most cases while significantly reducing CPU cycle consumption, reserving full computational power for only the necessary refinement operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If traditional screen capture methods are used, then implementation is simple, but video streaming capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo streaming capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal video capture system that can handle multiple input sources including direct video inputs, screen captures, and webcam feeds through a single unified processing pipeline. The system uses configurable capture modes that adapt to different input types, enabling versatile video streaming capability while managing complexity through standardized processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic configurability to the video capture system, allowing users to select different capture modes (direct video, screen capture, webcam) and adjust processing parameters in real-time. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize performance for different应用场景 while maintaining a manageable complexity structure through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8861591B2Software video encoder with GPU acceleration
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 MAGNUSON RESEARCH LLC
  • US8861591B2 patent drawing
  • US8861591B2 patent drawing
  • US8861591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of a software video encoder with GPU acceleration include a software encoder that partitions video processing tasks and assigns them to both a graphics processing unit (GPU) and a central processing unit (CPU). The partitioning and assigning is configurable for operation in different modes. The modes include a mode in which the total time for video processing (such as when transcoding a large existing file) is reduced, a mode in which less CPU cycles are consumed, thus freeing the CPU for other work, a mode in which the latency of processing (e.g., for video conferencing) is reduced, and a mode in which information from a game or other real-time activity being displayed on the screen is encoded.