Image Processing Apparatus Gradation Region Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing technologies face challenges in accurately identifying gradation regions in images, as they are often confused with low-contrast texture and edge regions, and are affected by noise, leading to inefficient noise-reduction processing.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that calculates dispersion and average values in multiple pixel groups with the pixel of interest and its peripherals, arranged in different directions, to determine whether the pixel belongs to a gradation region based on specific threshold conditions, applying appropriate noise-reduction processing accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If spatial frequency calculation by discrete cosine transformation is used to identify gradation sections, then gradation regions can be identified, but edge sections and flat sections are often misidentified due to noise and low-contrast textures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradation region identification accuracyVSAvoidmisidentification rate of edge and flat sections
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing method segments the analysis by dividing pixel groups into different directional orientations (first direction and second direction perpendicular to the first). This segmentation allows independent calculation of first and second values for each direction, enabling more precise characterization of local image structures and reducing misidentification of edge and flat sections as gradation regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a directional dimension by analyzing pixel groups in multiple orientations (first direction and second direction). Instead of single-value analysis, the method calculates values in two perpendicular directions and compares their magnitudes, adding orientational information that helps distinguish true gradation regions from edge regions and low-contrast textures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If noise-reduction processing is applied to all regions, then noise can be reduced, but processing time increases and gradation regions may be over-smoothed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise level in imageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies local quality by determining noise-reduction processing parameters specifically for gradation regions based on the relationship between first and second values. Only pixels identified as belonging to gradation regions receive specific noise-reduction processing, while other regions (edge sections, flat sections) are processed differently or not at all, thereby reducing overall processing time and preventing over-smoothing of important image features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system performs self-service by automatically identifying gradation regions through the directional value comparison method and autonomously applying appropriate noise-reduction processing only to those regions. This self-identification and selective processing eliminates the need for manual region specification and optimizes processing efficiency without requiring external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple pixel groups in different directions are analyzed to improve gradation identification, then identification accuracy improves, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradation region identification accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calculation complexity is managed through segmentation by dividing pixel groups into directional subsets (first direction and second direction). Each segmented group is processed independently to calculate its value, and the results are compared. This segmentation approach organizes the calculation workload systematically and reduces overall complexity compared to analyzing all pixels simultaneously without directional grouping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10565688B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and image processing program
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US10565688B2 patent drawing
  • US10565688B2 patent drawing
  • US10565688B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes: a dispersion calculation unit for calculating a dispersion of pixel values in each of a plurality of pixel groups which are each composed of a pixel of interest and peripheral pixels around the pixel of interest in an image and in which the pixel of interest and the peripheral pixels are arranged in directions different from one another; and a gradation determination unit for determining whether or not the pixel of interest belongs to a gradation region on the basis of a magnitude relationship among the dispersions calculated by the dispersion calculation unit.