Graded Hard-Metal Body for Wear Resistance and Toughness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hard-metal bodies face a trade-off between wear resistance and toughness, with methods to enhance one property often compromising the other, and existing techniques for creating graded structures can result in fragile cores or the formation of brittle phases.

Innovation Solution

A method for creating a hard-metal body with a graded structure, where the surface region has a lower binder content and higher carbon content than the core, achieved through pre-sintering and carburization processes, allowing for a controlled carbon and tungsten gradient that enhances wear resistance and toughness without forming eta-phases or free carbon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the binder content is decreased to increase hardness and wear resistance, then wear resistance is improved, but toughness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a graded binder distribution where the surface region has lower binder content (higher hardness) and the core region has higher binder content (higher toughness). This allows different regions of the same hard-metal body to have optimized properties for their specific functional requirements, resolving the contradiction between wear resistance and toughness at the component level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If grain growth inhibitor is added to reduce carbide grain size and increase hardness, then hardness is improved, but toughness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a graded binder distribution where the surface region has lower binder content (higher hardness) and the core region has higher binder content (higher toughness). This allows different regions of the same hard-metal body to have optimized properties for their specific functional requirements, resolving the contradiction between wear resistance and toughness at the component level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If carbon content is decreased to prevent eta-phase formation and improve toughness, then toughness is improved, but wear resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetoughnessVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a graded binder distribution where the surface region has lower binder content (higher hardness) and the core region has higher binder content (higher toughness). This allows different regions of the same hard-metal body to have optimized properties for their specific functional requirements, resolving the contradiction between wear resistance and toughness at the component level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If a uniform hard-metal structure is used to simplify manufacturing, then ease of manufacture is improved, but performance deteriorates due to inability to optimize both hardness and toughness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcombined hardness-toughness performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the binder content parameter through the structure of the hard-metal body, creating a continuous gradient from surface to core. This allows optimization of both hardness and toughness within a single component without requiring complex multi-step manufacturing processes, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in a hard-metal body with significantly improved wear resistance and toughness, prolonging the working life of tools in high-wear applications by maintaining a high hardness-toughness coefficient in the surface region while avoiding brittleness in the core.

Implementation Method 1

the surface region has a lower binder content and higher carbon content than the core, achieved through pre-sintering and carburization processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarburization: Carburizing

Implementation Method 2

allowing for a controlled carbon and tungsten gradient that enhances wear resistance and toughness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentEP2401099B2A hard-metal body
Publication Date: 2018.07.11 ELEMENT SIX GMBH
  • EP2401099B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2A
  • EP2401099B2 patent drawingFigure 2B~2C
  • EP2401099B2 patent drawingFigure 2D

AI summary

The invention relates to hard-metal body comprising a hard-metal, the hard-metal comprising tungsten carbide grains and metal binder comprising cobalt having a concentration of tungsten dissolved therein, the body comprising a surface region adjacent a surface and a core region remote from the surface, the surface region and the core region being contiguous with each other; the mean binder fraction of the core region being greater than that of the surface region; the mean carbon concentration within the binder being higher in the surface region than in the core region; to tools comprising same and methods of making same.