Gradient Compression with Sparse Mapping for Faster Distributed Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed training of neural networks is hindered by substantial network latency during gradient exchange between worker nodes, which diminishes the training time reduction achieved by distributing the training process across multiple computing systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing gradient compression techniques by clipping gradients below a threshold and generating a mapping for non-clipped data elements, allowing for efficient transmission and reconstruction of compressed data between worker nodes in a distributed system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gradient compression is implemented by clipping gradients below a threshold, then gradient exchange throughput requirements are reduced and compression rates improve, but data precision and training accuracy may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient exchange throughputVSAvoidgradient data precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation by clipping gradient values below a threshold to zero, transforming the gradient data from continuous to sparse format. This parameter change reduces the amount of data that needs to be exchanged while maintaining the essential information needed for training convergence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the significant gradient values (those above the threshold) for transmission, leaving out the insignificant values (below threshold) by setting them to zero. This extraction principle reduces communication overhead by focusing only on the important data elements that contribute meaningfully to the weight updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If distributed training is implemented across multiple worker nodes, then training time is reduced through parallel processing, but network latency during gradient exchange increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidnetwork latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and transmits only the non-zero gradient values along with their positions, removing the need to transmit redundant zero values. This significantly reduces the communication volume between worker nodes, thereby reducing network latency and allowing distributed training to scale more effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the communication parameter from transmitting full gradient vectors to transmitting sparse gradient representations with position metadata. This parameter change reduces the communication burden on the network while maintaining the essential information needed for synchronized training across distributed workers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If full precision gradient data is transmitted between worker nodes, then training accuracy is maintained, but communication bandwidth requirements and hardware complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accuracyVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the meaningful gradient information (non-zero values) and transmits them with position indicators, removing unnecessary zero values from the communication stream. This reduces the hardware requirements for data transmission and processing while preserving the essential information needed for accurate training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a compressed representation of the gradient data that copies only the essential information (non-zero values and their positions) rather than copying the entire gradient vector. This compressed copy reduces communication bandwidth requirements while maintaining training accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12354010B2Gradient compression for distributed training
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12354010B2 patent drawing
  • US12354010B2 patent drawing
  • US12354010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for exchanging compressed gradient data within a distributed system are disclosed. A set of gradients are computed at a first worker node of the distributed system using a neural network model and a set of weights associated with the neural network model. Each of the set of gradients having a value less than a threshold is clipped, resulting in non-clipped data elements and clipped data elements. A mapping indicating which of the set of gradients correspond to non-clipped data elements and which of the set of gradients correspond to clipped data elements is generated. Compressed data is generated based on the non-clipped data elements. The mapping and the compressed data are transmitted from the first worker node to a second worker node of the distributed system.