Gradient Core-Sheath Carbon Fiber for Interface Microfracture Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional composite materials face challenges with decreased interface properties between fibers and matrix, leading to reduced impact resistance and increased weight and manufacturing costs, despite the use of high-modulus carbon fibers and nanostructure reinforcement like carbon nanotubes.

Innovation Solution

A core-sheath carbon fiber design is developed, where the inner-volume portion contains aligned carbon nanostructures acting as an orientation template for the polymer, enhancing tensile modulus and strength, while the outer-volume portion encompasses the inner portion with a different polymer, providing gradient properties that improve resistance to microfracture formation at the fiber-matrix interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high-modulus carbon fibers with ordered graphitic structures are used, then tensile strength and stiffness are improved, but interface properties between fiber and matrix deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidinterface properties
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fiber is designed with non-uniform microstructure: the core region contains amorphous carbon providing ductility and interface compatibility, while the outer region contains ordered graphitic structures providing high strength and stiffness. This local differentiation allows each region to fulfill its specific function, resolving the contradiction between overall fiber performance and interface properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fiber combines two distinct carbon structures (amorphous carbon and ordered graphitic carbon) within a single fiber architecture. The amorphous core acts as a transition zone that bridges the soft matrix and the stiff outer graphitic region, creating a composite structure that simultaneously achieves high strength and good interface adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If carbon nanotubes are added to liquid resin, then impact resistance and fracture toughness are improved, but viscosity increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the reinforcement function from the matrix resin and relocates it to the fiber structure itself. Carbon nanotubes are incorporated into the fiber during manufacturing, creating a self-reinforced fiber where the nanotubes are pre-aligned and integrated into the fiber architecture, eliminating the need to add them to the liquid resin later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The carbon nanotubes are pre-aligned and incorporated into the fiber structure during the fiber manufacturing process, before the fiber is used in composite materials. This preliminary structuring ensures optimal orientation and distribution of nanotubes without requiring high concentrations in the liquid resin, thus avoiding viscosity issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional carbon fiber manufacturing is used, then production efficiency is maintained, but fiber core microstructure remains amorphous with suboptimal properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidfiber core strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process parameters are modified to control the thermal history of the fiber core. By adjusting temperature profiles, heating rates, and treatment durations during carbonization, the process transforms the amorphous core microstructure into a desired structure while maintaining production efficiency. The key is optimizing these parameters to achieve the target microstructure without excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The core-sheath fiber design achieves improved resistance to microfracture formation at the fiber-matrix interface, maintaining high strength and stiffness with reduced weight and cost, by aligning polymer chains with nanostructures and varying tensile modulus and strength gradients.

Implementation Method 1

The nanostructures act as an orientation template for orientation of the one or more first polymers in a direction parallel to a longitudinal axis of the fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOrientation templating:

Implementation Method 2

The fiber has gradient properties that vary from the tensile modulus and the strength that are higher in the inner-volume portion to the tensile modulus and the strength that are lower in the outer-volume portion, resulting in the fiber having an improved resistance to microfracture formation at a fiber-matrix interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGradient structure effect:

Data Source

PatentEP2788536B1Fiber with gradient properties and method of making the same
Publication Date: 2020.09.16 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2788536B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2788536B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2788536B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is provided a fiber and method of making a fiber. The fiber has an inner-volume portion having a first outer diameter, a plurality of nanostructures, and one or more first polymers. The nanostructures act as an orientation template for orientation of the one or more first polymers in a direction parallel to a longitudinal axis of the fiber. The fiber has an outer-volume portion having a second outer diameter and one or more second polymers. The outer-volume portion is in contact with and completely encompasses the inner-volume portion. The inner-volume portion has at least one of a tensile modulus and a strength that are higher than at least one of a tensile modulus and a strength of the outer-volume portion.