Gradient Dropping in Federated Learning for PAPR-Constrained OTA Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G NR, face challenges in efficiently aggregating local model updates from user equipment (UEs) due to constraints such as channel gain, peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR), and RF emission specifications, which affect the reliability and efficiency of over-the-air (OTA) aggregation in federated learning.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for user equipment (UE) and base stations to identify and drop local model update elements based on channel gain, PAPR, and RF emission specifications, transmitting these elements via analog signaling for OTA aggregation, allowing for efficient updating of global machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all local model update elements are transmitted for OTA aggregation, then the accuracy of global model update is improved, but the communication overhead and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of global model updateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and transmits only the essential model update elements (selected gradient elements or updated model parameters) rather than all update elements. The base station identifies and selects critical update elements from multiple UEs that contribute most to global model improvement, reducing transmission volume while maintaining update effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by transmitting a subset of model update elements rather than complete sets from all UEs. The base station determines optimal numbers of gradient elements and model parameters to transmit, achieving sufficient model accuracy with reduced communication overhead and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Speed

If multiple model update elements are transmitted simultaneously, then the convergence speed of federated learning is improved, but the PAPR and RF emission constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence speed of federated learningVSAvoidPAPR and RF emission constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes transmission parameters by selectively determining which gradient elements and model parameters to transmit based on channel conditions, PAPR constraints, and RF emission specifications. The base station adjusts the number and type of update elements transmitted to maintain convergence speed while satisfying physical layer constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The base station performs preliminary identification and selection of model update elements before transmission, assessing channel conditions and constraint requirements in advance. This preliminary action enables optimal selection of update elements that achieve fast convergence while pre-compliance with PAPR and RF emission constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If selective dropping of model update elements is performed, then the communication efficiency is improved, but the model update accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidmodel update accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The base station receives feedback from UEs about local model training status and channel conditions, using this feedback to intelligently select which model update elements to transmit. The selection process incorporates feedback on update element importance, channel quality, and constraint conditions to maintain accuracy while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality standards to different model update elements based on their importance and channel conditions. Critical gradient elements and model parameters are transmitted with higher priority and redundancy, while less critical elements are selectively dropped, achieving differentiated quality transmission that maintains overall accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12401436B2Gradient dropping for federated learning
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12401436B2 patent drawing
  • US12401436B2 patent drawing
  • US12401436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A UE may identify a plurality of local model update elements associated with an updated local machine learning model. The updated local machine learning model may have been generated based on a global machine learning model received from a base station and a local dataset. The UE may identify one or more local model update elements of the plurality of local model update elements for update element dropping based on at least one of a channel gain, a PAPR specification, an RF emission specification, or an RF condition. The UE may transmit, to the base station over a multiple access channel via analog signaling, at least some local model update elements of the plurality of local model update elements based on dropping of the identified one or more local model update elements.