Gradient Flow Meta-Learning with Runge-Kutta Solvers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gradient-based meta learning methods, such as MAML, face limitations in accurately adapting the learning rule for machine learning tasks due to the use of basic ordinary differential equation solvers like Euler's method, which fail to accurately follow the dynamics specified by the learning rule, leading to suboptimal performance in learning to solve related tasks.

Innovation Solution

The method employs gradient flow, a variant of gradient descent in continuous-time, represented as an ordinary differential equation, which uses more accurate solvers like the explicit Runge-Kutta method to determine the learning rule, allowing for improved adaptation and feedback in machine learning systems by solving initial value problems and employing gradient checkpointing for increased memory efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If basic ODE solvers like Euler's method are used to solve the initial value problem in gradient-based meta learning, then the computational simplicity is maintained, but the accuracy of following the learning rule dynamics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational simplicityVSAvoidaccuracy of learning rule adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of the ODE solver from basic Euler's method to higher-order methods like Runge-Kutta, improving the accuracy of solving the initial value problem while maintaining computational feasibility through systematic parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the basic numerical solver mechanism with a more sophisticated gradient flow approach using higher-order ODE solvers, substituting the simple Euler method with a more accurate mathematical framework that better captures the continuous-time dynamics of gradient-based learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If higher-order ODE solvers like Runge-Kutta method are used to solve the initial value problem, then the accuracy of learning rule adaptation is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of learning rule adaptationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computation of intermediate values during the Runge-Kutta method execution, storing them for later use in gradient calculation, which reduces redundant computations and mitigates the computational complexity burden of higher-order solvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the computation into distinct phases: forward pass to compute solution values, and backward pass to compute gradients, allowing efficient memory management and computational optimization by processing different components separately rather than simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the complete solution trajectory is stored in memory for gradient calculation, then the accuracy of gradient computation is maintained, but the memory consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of gradient computationVSAvoidmemory consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and stores only the essential intermediate values needed for gradient computation during the forward pass, rather than storing the complete solution trajectory, reducing memory consumption while maintaining gradient accuracy through selective extraction of critical computational states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computation and storage of intermediate values during the forward pass that will be needed for the backward pass, allowing efficient gradient calculation without requiring complete trajectory storage by preparing necessary computational components in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220101196A1Device for and computer implemented method of machine learning
Publication Date: 2022.03.31 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20220101196A1 patent drawing
  • US20220101196A1 patent drawing
  • US20220101196A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of machine learning a model for mapping a dataset to a solution of a task depending on a first parameter. The method includes determining a second parameter for assigning the second parameter to the first parameter in a first iteration of learning and determining a third parameter for determining a rate for changing the first parameter in at least one iteration of learning depending on the third parameter and depending on a measure for evaluating the solution to the task. The determining of the second or third parameter includes determining a solution of an initial value problem that depends on partial derivatives, and determining the second parameter and/or the third parameter depending on at least one of the partial derivatives.