Forward-Style Gradient GeMM Graph Splitting for Dataflow Processors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing compute graphs for coarse-grained reconfigurable processors remains a challenge, particularly in efficiently executing machine learning and artificial intelligence workloads that require massively parallel computations and complex dataflow graphs.

Innovation Solution

A method for improving runtime performance by receiving a compute graph for execution on a reconfigurable dataflow processor, involving tensor slicing, reshaping, and tiling, followed by general matrix multiplication operations, and appending addition nodes to form a modified compute graph, which enables parallel processing of tensor slices and resource optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If template-based operations are used on tensors with shared batch dimension, then the operation can be performed in a unified manner, but the compute resource utilization is poor and place and route issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation implementationVSAvoidcompute resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing a single template-based operation node into multiple independent GeMM operation nodes, where each node processes a specific batch element. This segmentation transforms one complex operation into B simpler operations that can be independently scheduled and executed, improving compute resource utilization and avoiding place and route congestion while maintaining the unified operation semantics through subsequent addition nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If nodes are split into multiple parallel nodes for batch processing, then runtime performance improves, but the compute graph complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruntime performanceVSAvoidcompute graph complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining B parallel GeMM operation nodes through addition nodes that aggregate their outputs. This merging strategy maintains the parallel execution benefits for runtime performance while providing a systematic way to manage compute graph complexity through structured composition of simpler operation nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional compilers are used for optimizing compute graphs, then general-purpose processing is maintained, but pipelining operations and data routing become inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing flexibilityVSAvoidpipelining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the operational parameters of tensor computations from template-based unified operations to explicit GeMM operations with specific batch dimensions. This parameter transformation enables the compute graph to be optimized for dataflow processing, improving pipelining efficiency and data routing while maintaining adaptability through the reconfigurable nature of the underlying processor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12632269B2Forward-style gradient GeMMs
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 SAMBANOVA SYSTEMS INC
  • US12632269B2 patent drawing
  • US12632269B2 patent drawing
  • US12632269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving runtime performance and alleviating place and route issues in a reconfigurable computing system includes receiving a compute graph for execution on a reconfigurable dataflow processor. The compute graph includes a node specifying a template-based operation on a first and second tensor having a shared batch dimension B. The node may be split into B nodes. Each of the template-based operations on the pair of tensors may be replace with a GeMM operation on the first reduced rank tensor slice and a tile. B nodes that specify the GeMM operation may be appended with at least one first addition node that accepts input from the B nodes to produce a first modified compute graph. The first modified compute graph may be executed. The method describes a significant improvement to overall compute utilization across gradient-sections. Spatial tiling of tensors facilitates gradient calculation without the use of accumulators.