Gradient Spectacle Lens Evaluation for Precise Transition Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating gradient spectacle lenses, such as sunglasses, are subjective and lack precision in determining the position and width of color transitions, making it difficult to adapt production processes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that calculates scalar values representing differences in color and transmission measurements across the lens, allowing for quantitative evaluation by comparing these values to thresholds and ideal curves, thereby identifying precise positions and widths of color transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual observation with a special ruler is used to measure gradient width, then the measurement process is simple and quick, but the measurement precision is low due to subjectivity and human eye limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient width measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical visual observation method with a digital imaging system that captures lens images and uses image processing algorithms to automatically measure gradient positions and widths. This substitution eliminates human subjectivity while maintaining operational simplicity through automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the lens gradient through imaging and uses this copy for measurement analysis. By working with the digital representation rather than the physical lens directly, the system achieves precise measurements without requiring complex physical measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If the Smart Shade device is used to analyze gradients, then automatic measurement is achieved, but no further information is obtained about the measured lens beyond a percentual match

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about gradient position and widthVSAvoidautomatic measurement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lens into distinct regions (darker area, transition area, lighter area) and measures each region's properties independently. This segmentation allows the system to provide detailed information about position and width of each gradient zone while maintaining automated measurement through computer-based image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from the Smart Shade's one-dimensional percentual match metric to a two-dimensional analysis that provides both positional information (where the gradient occurs) and dimensional information (how wide each gradient zone is). This adds critical dimensions of information while preserving automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a reference point identification method is used, then the measurement can be standardized, but the method fails when reference points do not exactly match between master and sample lenses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to different lens types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic reference point identification system that automatically adapts to each lens being measured. Rather than requiring fixed pre-defined reference points, the system identifies reference points based on the actual lens characteristics during measurement, making it reliable across different lens types while maintaining standardization through automated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed reference point coordinates to dynamically determined reference points based on lens-specific parameters. This allows the measurement system to adapt to variations in lens design while maintaining consistent measurement methodology through parameter-based identification rather than position-based identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250383258A1Method suitable for gradient spectacle lens evaluation and corresponding device
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 CARL ZEISS VISION INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US20250383258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383258A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383258A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method suitable for gradient spectacle lens evaluation and a corresponding computer are provided. Measurement data indicating at least one of a color or a transmission of a plurality of measurement points along at least one line across the spectacle lens is received. The method further includes calculating scalar values representing a difference of the measurement data of adjacent or overlapping measurement point groups of the plurality of measurement points. The spectacle lens is then evaluated based on the scalar values.