Near-Field Gradient Probe for RF Interference Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing near-field sensor probe systems face challenges in suppressing radio frequency interference (RFI) from far-field sources without significantly degrading near-field signal sensitivity, particularly in applications like explosive detection and RFID systems, where strong far-field noise sources interfere with weak NQR signals.

Innovation Solution

The configuration of five loops, with a larger central loop surrounded by smaller peripheral loops, is used to suppress far-field interference while maintaining high near-field sensitivity, achieved by ensuring the current in the larger loop flows in the opposite direction in the smaller loops, effectively canceling out far-field voltages and minimizing phase dispersion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If loop antenna systems are designed to suppress far-field interaction, then far-field RF interference is reduced, but near-field signal sensitivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefar-field RF interferenceVSAvoidnear-field signal sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna system is segmented into multiple loops of different sizes (at least two loops with different areas) positioned at different locations. Each loop segment responds differently to far-field versus near-field signals, allowing selective suppression of far-field interference while preserving near-field sensitivity through combined output processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different loops are assigned different characteristics (size, position, orientation) to create local quality variations. The larger loop provides stronger far-field suppression, while smaller loops maintain better near-field coupling. The system exploits these local differences to achieve frequency-selective interference rejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If larger loop antennas are used to enhance near-field coupling, then near-field sensitivity improves, but far-field interaction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenear-field signal sensitivityVSAvoidfar-field RF interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the antenna function across multiple loops of different sizes. The larger loop captures strong near-field signals while the smaller loop(s) provide far-field suppression. By combining their outputs with appropriate weighting, the system achieves both enhanced near-field sensitivity and far-field rejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The outputs of multiple loops with different characteristics are merged through signal processing. The larger loop's strong near-field response is combined with the smaller loop's far-field suppression capability, creating a composite signal that achieves both objectives simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple loops are combined to suppress far-field signals, then far-field suppression improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefar-field RF interferenceVSAvoidantenna system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna is segmented into multiple simple loop structures that can be independently constructed and positioned. Each loop remains a simple geometric shape, but their collective arrangement provides sophisticated far-field suppression functionality without requiring complex individual elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly enhances near-field sensitivity while maintaining practical levels of far-field suppression, improving the detection of weak signals in noisy environments without the penalties of previous technologies, such as reduced sensitivity or bulky shielding.

Implementation Method 1

Electromagnetic waves propagating from antenna systems have near-field and far-field radiation regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the magnitude and direction of the current within the loops generate fields that cancel each other in the far-field region (that is, the vector sum of the fields created from each of the antenna loops is close to zero)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVector sum cancellation: Interference

Implementation Method 3

The near-field is generally within a small number of wavelengths from the antenna and is characterized by a high concentration of energy and energy storage in non-radiating fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear-field energy storage: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11733281B2Alternative near-field gradient probe for the suppression of radio frequency interference
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 LAVEDAS TOM
  • US11733281B2 patent drawing
  • US11733281B2 patent drawing
  • US11733281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor probe. The probe includes a central loop and a plurality of peripheral loops disposed peripherally relative to the central loop. To maximize far-field suppression, current flows in a first direction through the central loop and in a second direction through each one of the plurality of peripheral loops, the first direction opposite to the second direction, and current through the central loop equals current through the plurality of peripheral loops.