Dynamic Gradient Rise Time Adjustment for MR Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences are often noisy due to rapidly changing gradient fields, which cause distortions and oscillations, leading to increased noise development and patient discomfort.

Innovation Solution

The method involves dynamically adjusting the rise times of gradients with each high-frequency pulse irradiation during MR image data acquisition, optimizing ramp times for each repetition to minimize noise and maintain a constant gradient value only during data acquisition, thereby reducing dB/dt values and noise generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gradient fields are rapidly switched to achieve fast imaging, then imaging speed is improved, but noise development increases due to distortions and oscillations in the gradient coil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging speedVSAvoidnoise development
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the gradient pulse sequence adaptive rather than fixed. The rise times of gradient pulses are dynamically adjusted based on the specific imaging requirements and gradient coil characteristics, allowing optimization of the balance between imaging speed and noise generation for each individual pulse sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of gradient rise times from fixed values to variable parameters that can be optimized. By adjusting rise times as a variable parameter in the gradient pulse sequence, the system can minimize dB/dt values and reduce noise while maintaining fast imaging capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If rise times of gradients are increased to reduce noise, then noise development is reduced, but the minimum repetition time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise developmentVSAvoidminimum repetition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting optimal rise times that are sufficient to reduce noise but not excessively long. The rise times are optimized to achieve the minimum necessary duration to minimize dB/dt values, avoiding unnecessary time extension while still achieving noise reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the parameter of rise times to find the optimal balance point. By treating rise time as an adjustable parameter, the system can determine the minimum sufficient duration that achieves noise reduction without unnecessarily increasing the repetition time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If imaging gradients are switched on at the time of excitation to achieve ultrashort echo time, then echo time is reduced, but gradient distances between repetitions become larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveecho timeVSAvoidgradient distances
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing the gradient system in advance for the excitation pulse. By pre-switching imaging gradients to the desired amplitude before the excitation pulse, the system achieves ultrashort echo times while the gradient distances are managed through optimized rise time parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces noise development, optimizes gradient activity time, and minimizes patient stimulation by reducing dB/dt values, resulting in a quieter and more efficient MR imaging process.

Implementation Method 1

In order to trigger nuclear spin resonances (e.g., nuclear spin signals), high-frequency excitation pulses (e.g., HF excitation pulses) or high-frequency pulses are irradiated into the examination subject, the triggered nuclear spin resonances are measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNuclear spin resonance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

rapidly changing gradient fields that result in distortions and oscillations in the gradient coil and the transmission of this energy to the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9482731B2Dynamic adjustment of gradient rise times for MR HF pulse sequences
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9482731B2 patent drawing
  • US9482731B2 patent drawing
  • US9482731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for image data acquisition using a magnetic resonance system, in order to excite nuclear spin signals, a sequence of high-frequency pulses is irradiated into an examination subject while gradients are simultaneously switched for position encoding of the excited nuclear spin signals. The rise times of the gradients used during the sequence are adjusted dynamically with each high-frequency pulse irradiation.