Gradient Gas Separation Beds With Recycle Zone Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adsorption-based gas separation systems face inefficiencies in separation efficiency and recovery at larger scales, particularly in the renewable energy sector, due to inadequate consideration of adsorption kinetics and vessel configurations.

Innovation Solution

The system modulates concentration gradients in adsorbent beds to create distinct zones for enhanced component recovery and purity by employing vertically oriented beds and controlling the location of the 'recycle zone' through gas recycling and pressure management, utilizing concentration profiles and selective adsorption to isolate product, recycle, and by-product zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If standard vessel sizes with small inlet and outlet orifices are used, then system plumbing is simplified, but separation efficiency becomes relatively low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem plumbing simplicityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the vessel by using non-standard aspect ratios (length-to-diameter ratios) and optimizing orifice sizes relative to vessel dimensions. This allows the system to achieve both simplified plumbing and improved separation efficiency by scaling the system appropriately rather than being constrained to standard vessel sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of flow rates and pressure differentials during the adsorption and desorption cycles. By dynamically adjusting operational parameters rather than using fixed configurations, the system optimizes separation efficiency while maintaining plumbing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If conventional adsorption vessel configurations are used, then deployment is straightforward, but recovery and purity at higher scales become insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidcomponent recovery and purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the adsorption bed into multiple zones with different functional characteristics (enrichment zone, transition zone, product zone, recycle zone). This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high recovery and purity at scale while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized zone configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the adsorption bed are given different local properties through the zone segmentation. The enrichment zone has high adsorbate concentration, the transition zone has gradient properties, the product zone has high purity, and the recycle zone handles low-concentration streams. This local differentiation enables high-performance separation at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If adsorption kinetics are not considered in system design, then system configuration is simpler, but separation performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem configuration complexityVSAvoidseparation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and design of the adsorption zones based on expected kinetics behavior before actual operation. The enrichment zone, transition zone, and product zone are pre-configured with specific dimensions and positions that account for adsorption kinetics, allowing the system to achieve high separation performance without adding operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If fewer operational stages are used, then system cost is reduced, but recovery and purity requirements become harder to meet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of operational stagesVSAvoidrecovery and purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous recycling of the low-concentration stream from the recycle zone back to the enrichment zone. This continuous action allows the system to approach theoretical maximum recovery and purity in a single pass through the adsorption bed, eliminating the need for multiple sequential stages while meeting product specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the recovery and purity of the primary component in the product gas stream, achieving high purity and efficient gas separation with reduced operational stages and costs.

Implementation Method 1

a first bed of adsorbent and nonuniformly adsorbed in the direction of flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

concentration gradients arising from nonuniform adsorption of a gas component in a quantity of adsorbent can be modulated and isolated into zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConcentration gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20260070014A1Gradient separator system and method
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 AMERESCO INC
  • US20260070014A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070014A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070014A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method and a system of determining transition characteristics during a transition in a relative concentrations of the at least two components of a gas stream. The transition characteristics, including one or more of a relative concentration transition crosspoint, a relative concentration transition leading edge, and a relative concentration transition trailing edge, may be determined based on one or more of a) a change in the one or more of a pressure and a flow rate of the gas stream, and b) a rate of change of the one or more of the pressure and the flow rate.