Gradient Tool System for Composite Parts CTE Mismatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Composite parts often warp or bend due to thermal stresses caused by mismatched coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) between the part and the tool used in autoclave curing, leading to increased manufacturing costs and rejected parts.

Innovation Solution

A gradient tool system is introduced, comprising two tool components with different CTE materials, where the first surface matches the CTE of the composite part and the second surface has a different CTE, allowing for controlled thermal expansion and stress management through a varying CTE gradient, reducing thermal stresses and deformations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a tool material with CTE matching the composite part is used, then warping is reduced, but the tool cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart shape accuracyVSAvoidtool cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into multiple layers with different materials, each having different CTE values. The first layer (contacting the part) has CTE matching the composite part, while subsequent layers have progressively different CTE values, creating a gradient structure that reduces overall tool cost while maintaining shape accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Only the first layer of the tool that directly contacts the composite part uses the expensive CTE-matched material. The underlying layers use progressively cheaper materials with different CTE values, optimizing material usage locally where it is most needed for shape control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If Invar tools are used to match CTE, then warping is reduced, but the tool weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart shape accuracyVSAvoidtool weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The tool uses a composite structure with multiple layers of different materials (including aluminum and other metals with varying CTE values) instead of solid Invar. This composite approach achieves the desired CTE matching at the part-contact surface while reducing overall tool weight through the use of lighter materials in the underlying layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed thermal modeling is performed to design tooling compensation, then warping is reduced, but the development time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart shape accuracyVSAvoidmodeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The CTE gradient is built into the tool design from the beginning, before any thermal modeling or compensation is needed. This preliminary structural design inherently compensates for thermal expansion differences, eliminating the need for time-consuming detailed thermal modeling and iterative compensation design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If tool surface compensation is used, then warping is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart shape accuracyVSAvoidtool structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding complex compensation mechanisms or adjusting surface geometries, the solution changes the fundamental material parameter (CTE) of the tool layers by using a gradient of materials with different CTE values. This parameter-based approach simplifies the overall tool structure while achieving the desired warping control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The gradient tool system effectively reduces warping and deformations, decreases the number of rejected parts, and lowers production costs by matching the thermal expansion of the tool to the composite part, while allowing for cost-effective tool design and replacement of only the first tool component.

Implementation Method 1

the first surface comprising a first material having a first coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and the second surface comprising a second material having a second CTE. The first CTE of the first material is different than the second CTE of the second material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS10870221B2Gradient tool system for composite parts
Publication Date: 2020.12.22 THE BOEING CO
  • US10870221B2 patent drawing
  • US10870221B2 patent drawing
  • US10870221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gradient tool for forming a part, the gradient tool comprising a first tool component comprising a first surface and a second surface. The first surface comprising a first material having a first coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and the second surface comprising a second material having a second CTE. The first CTE of the first material is different than the second CTE of the second material.