Gradient Variance Active Learning for Neural Network Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active learning in neural networks is inefficient due to the high cost and time required for annotating large volumes of data, and existing methods can introduce implicit biases and unintended shifts in the model during training.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize variations in gradients from a dataset to identify a smaller subset of data for annotation, employing a gradient pool and variance calculation to request annotation only for data points that significantly impact the model's performance, thereby reducing the need for extensive oracle input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active learning annotates large volumes of data to improve neural network accuracy, then model performance is improved, but annotation time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network accuracyVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large volume of unlabeled data into smaller subsets based on gradient variance characteristics. By dividing the data into groups with similar gradient properties, the system can selectively annotate only those segments with high variance that contribute most to model improvement, rather than annotating all data uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection parameter from uniform random sampling to gradient variance-based sampling. By using gradient variance as the selection criterion, the system identifies and annotates only the data points that have the greatest impact on model performance, reducing the total number of annotations needed while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If active learning annotates large volumes of data to improve neural network accuracy, then model performance is improved, but annotation cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network accuracyVSAvoidannotation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter from uniform random sampling to gradient variance-based sampling. By using gradient variance as the selection criterion, the system identifies and annotates only the data points that have the greatest impact on model performance, reducing the total number of annotations needed while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by annotating only the necessary portion of data (high gradient variance samples) rather than the entire dataset. This selective approach performs just enough annotation to achieve model improvement without the excessive cost of annotating all available data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If existing active learning methods are used to select data for annotation, then annotation process is simplified, but implicit biases are introduced dependent on initial training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation process simplicityVSAvoidannotation bias
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces gradient variance as an intermediary metric between the model and data selection process. This intermediary provides an objective, quantitative criterion for selecting data points that is independent of the initial training data distribution, thereby reducing implicit biases while maintaining operational simplicity through automated selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If oracle annotates data points with high impact on model performance, then training efficiency is improved, but determining which data points to annotate becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoiddata selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter from complex multi-criteria evaluation to a single parameter: gradient variance. This simplifies the data selection process while maintaining the ability to identify high-impact data points, as gradient variance directly measures the influence of data points on model parameters during training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12079738B2Variance of gradient based active learning framework for training perception algorithms
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12079738B2 patent drawing
  • US12079738B2 patent drawing
  • US12079738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Neural networks and learning algorithms can use a variance of gradients to provide a heuristic understanding of the model. The variance of gradients can be used in active learning techniques to train a neural network. Techniques include receiving a dataset with a vector. The dataset can be annotated and a loss calculated. The loss value can be used to update the neural network through backpropagation. An updated dataset can be used to calculate additional losses. The loss values can be added to a pool of gradients. A variance of gradients can be calculated from the pool of gradient vectors. The variance of gradients can be used to update a neural network.