Gradient Space Partitioning for Outlier-Robust Subgroup Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning methods struggle to identify and account for relevant subgroups in training data, particularly when these subgroups are unlabeled or unknown, leading to performance issues due to distribution shifts and fairness concerns, and are often sensitive to outliers.

Innovation Solution

The method employs Gradient Space Partitioning (GraSP) to identify gradient representations of data points, cluster them to estimate subgroup labels, and use outlier-robust clustering algorithms to learn group annotations, enabling the training of robust classifiers without requiring labeled subgroups or validation data with true annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional machine learning methods are used to optimize performance averaged over entire training data, then overall performance is improved, but performance on small subgroups deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall performanceVSAvoidperformance on small subgroups
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training data into subgroups using clustering algorithms (e.g., K-means, DBSCAN) to identify distinct subpopulations. This allows the model to separately optimize performance for each subgroup rather than treating all data uniformly, thereby improving reliability on small subgroups while maintaining overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by training separate models or adjusting training parameters for different subgroups identified through clustering. Each subgroup receives tailored training attention, allowing the model to adapt to local characteristics and performance requirements of specific subpopulations rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If distributionally robust optimization is used to optimize worst-subgroup performance, then reliability on subgroups is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworst-subgroup performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary clustering to identify subgroups before applying distributionally robust optimization. By pre-segmenting the data and estimating subgroup characteristics in advance, the subsequent DRO optimization can focus computational resources more efficiently, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining reliability improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing DRO optimization on identified subgroups rather than the entire dataset, and by using estimated subgroup labels rather than requiring complete ground truth annotations. This selective approach reduces computational burden while achieving meaningful reliability improvements on critical subgroups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If clustering algorithms are used to identify subgroups, then subgroup identification is improved, but sensitivity to outliers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubgroup identification accuracyVSAvoidoutlier sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of outliers into a beneficial signal by using clustering algorithms to identify and isolate outlier points. These outliers are then explicitly excluded from the training data or assigned to separate clusters, allowing the model to learn from clean data while maintaining accurate subgroup identification. The outlier detection capability becomes a feature that improves data quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary step using clustering algorithms as a mediator between raw data and final training data. This intermediate clustering layer filters out outliers and structures the data into meaningful subgroups, protecting the downstream training process from outlier contamination while maintaining precise subgroup identification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If group annotations are required for training, then model accuracy is improved, but data preparation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using unsupervised clustering algorithms to automatically identify subgroups without requiring manual annotation. The clustering algorithms self-organize the data into meaningful groups based on inherent patterns, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual labeling while maintaining accurate subgroup identification and model training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy of the data structure through clustering that mimics the organization of labeled data. By replicating the subgroup structure automatically, the model can train as if ground truth labels were available, achieving similar accuracy without the time investment required for manual annotation and data preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240362534A1Method for outlier robust subgroup inference via clustering in the gradient space
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240362534A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362534A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362534A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for identifying relevant subgroups, which are relevant for training a subgroup-robust classifier, in a training dataset associated with a machine learning model includes receiving a classification dataset wherein subgroups are unlabeled. For each data point in the classification dataset, the method uses gradient space partitioning (GraSP) to identify a gradient representation of each data point by extracting an associated gradient of a logistic regression classification loss with respect to weights of a logistic regression. The gradient representations are clustered to provide estimated subgroup labels the cluster assignments are output as the estimated subgroup labels.