Tow-Behind Grading Tool Drag Bar Spring Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tow-behind grading tools face issues such as bogging, stalling, and undesired compaction of the ground surface, along with insufficient removal of spoils like rocks and debris, due to overload and limited working capacity.

Innovation Solution

A tow-behind grading tool with a frame, rotatably coupled ground contacting members, a comb, a drag bar assembly with rotatable arms and springs that resist upward rotation, and a tow coupling member, which provides downward force to maintain the comb in a working position and facilitates spoil gathering without compacting the soil.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the grading tool increases its working capacity to handle more spoil, then productivity improves, but the tool becomes overloaded causing bogging and stalling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoil gathering capabilityVSAvoidtool stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The drag bar is made rotatable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically adjust its position and angle in response to varying spoil conditions and tool loading. This rotational freedom prevents rigid structural overload while maintaining effective spoil engagement, resolving the contradiction between handling capacity and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism changes the operational parameters of the drag bar by applying variable force that adjusts the drag bar's engagement with spoil based on resistance encountered. This allows the tool to maintain optimal working parameters across varying load conditions without becoming overloaded, improving both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the grading tool applies more force to the ground surface to improve grading effectiveness, then manufacturing precision improves, but undesired compaction of the ground surface occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading effectivenessVSAvoidsoil compaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ground contacting members are made rotatable rather than fixed, allowing them to dynamically adapt to ground surface variations. This rotation capability enables effective grading contact while reducing rigid compaction forces, as the members can roll over rather than press continuously into the soil, thus improving grading precision without causing harmful compaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotatable ground contacting members create a periodic contact pattern with the ground surface as they rotate, rather than continuous static pressure. This periodic action allows the ground to recover between contact points, reducing overall compaction while maintaining effective grading through repeated light contacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the drag bar is allowed to rotate upward freely to adapt to terrain, then adaptability improves, but the comb loses its working position and grading effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptationVSAvoidcomb working position
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The spring mechanism acts as a counterbalancing force that resists upward rotation of the drag bar beyond a certain point. This spring force maintains the comb in its proper working position while still allowing necessary terrain adaptation, preventing excessive upward rotation that would compromise grading effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism changes the rotational parameters of the drag bar by providing a restoring force that limits upward rotation. This maintains the comb at an optimal working angle while still permitting adaptive rotation for terrain variation, thus preserving both adaptability and grading precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool enhances spoil gathering capability, reduces soil compaction, and prevents bogging by maintaining the comb's working position and using a passive raking action, allowing for efficient grading operations without compacting the ground surface.

Implementation Method 1

at least one spring coupled with the frame and the drag bar assembly such that the spring resists upward rotation of the drag bar and provides force urging the drag bar to rotate downward after upward rotation of the drag bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10039222B1Tow-behind grading tool and operation thereof
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 ABI ATTACHMENTS INC
  • US10039222B1 patent drawing
  • US10039222B1 patent drawing
  • US10039222B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment is a tow-behind grading tool structured for attachment to a work machine. The tool includes a frame, ground contacting members rotatably coupled with the frame, a comb coupled with the frame and extending from a first end of the frame, a tow coupling member coupled with the frame and located proximate a second end of the frame, the second end of the frame being opposite the first end of the frame, a drag bar assembly including a plurality of arms rotatably coupled with the frame and drag bar rotatably coupled with the plurality of arms, and at least one spring coupled with the frame and the drag bar assembly such that the spring resists upward rotation of the drag bar and provides force urging the drag bar to rotate downward after upward rotation of the drag bar.