Grading Tool with Adjustable Pitch and Float Mode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional earth moving tools lack versatility and compatibility with various work machines, particularly in grading operations, and fail to provide effective passive float mode operation while maintaining active control over working depth.

Innovation Solution

A grading tool design featuring a frame with ground-contacting wheels, a comb, and a drag bar assembly, coupled with a work machine, allowing for adjustable pitch and rotation to enable both active and float mode operations, with hydraulic actuators for precise control over depth and motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional earth moving tools are designed for specific grading applications, then they achieve specialized performance for that application, but they lack versatility to perform multiple grading functions and operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading performanceVSAvoidmulti-function capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The grading tool is designed with multiple working components including a comb assembly with teeth for grading and scarifying, a drag bar assembly for leveling, and a rear blade for scraping. These components can be selectively positioned and adjusted to perform various grading functions such as forward grading, reverse grading, scarifying, and surface leveling, allowing a single tool to replace multiple specialized tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The tool incorporates adjustable components including the comb assembly that can be raised and lowered via hydraulic actuators, drag bar assembly with adjustable angle and position, and rear blade with variable inclination. These dynamic adjustments allow the tool to adapt to different grading applications and ground conditions, transforming a static single-function tool into a dynamic multi-function system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the grading tool is designed for active operator control over working depth, then precise depth control is achieved, but the tool cannot simultaneously provide passive float mode operation where the tool moves freely in response to ground surface changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth control precisionVSAvoidfloat mode capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic actuator system controlling the comb assembly and other working components is designed with float mode capability, allowing the operator to select between active control (where the actuator maintains precise depth positioning) and passive float mode (where the actuator allows free movement in response to ground surface variations). This dynamic control mode switching enables the same system to provide both precise depth control and adaptive float operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system allows changing the operational parameter of the hydraulic actuators from active positioning mode to passive float mode. By changing the control parameter (from active depth maintenance to passive movement allowance), the system transitions between providing precise depth control and enabling free movement over uneven surfaces, resolving the contradiction between control precision and float capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the grading tool is designed with multiple adjustable components for various grading operations, then operational versatility is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrading operation varietyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grading tool is divided into separate modular assemblies including the comb assembly, drag bar assembly, and rear blade assembly, each with its own adjustment mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be independently adjusted and maintained, and simplifies the overall control system by dividing it into manageable modules rather than a single complex integrated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple working components (comb, drag bar, rear blade) are integrated into a single tool platform that can be attached to various work machines. This universal design allows the same base structure to support multiple grading functions through component selection and adjustment, reducing the need for entirely separate specialized tools and thereby managing complexity through shared infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10508411B2Grading tools for work machines and operation thereof
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 ABI ATTACHMENTS INC
  • US10508411B2 patent drawing
  • US10508411B2 patent drawing
  • US10508411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment includes a grading tool structured for attachment to a work machine. The grading tool includes a frame, ground contacting wheels coupled with the frame, a comb coupled with the frame and extending from a first end of the frame, and a coupling member coupled with the frame and structured to be accessible from a second end of the frame. When the ground contacting wheels are in contact with the ground a depth of penetration of the comb into the ground surface is adjustable by changing the pitch of the grading tool.