Graduated Security Response for Industrial Control Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial control systems face increased security risks due to distributed processing and Internet connections, which can lead to physical damage and risk to human life, as evidenced by recent attacks on human machine interfaces and programmable logic controllers, and existing solutions do not provide adequate graduated responses to varying threat severities.

Innovation Solution

A security controller for industrial control systems that assesses the severity of malicious attacks by analyzing security thumbprints, allowing for tailored security responses, including access reduction, data logging, and communication with designated individuals, to mitigate damage and escalate security issues automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If physical security measures are used to protect industrial controllers, then physical access is limited, but network-based attacks can still compromise the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical securityVSAvoidnetwork attack vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments security monitoring into multiple independent components: security thumbprint collection from various system elements, separate analysis module, and graduated response mechanisms. This allows comprehensive security coverage across both physical and network domains without requiring a single monolithic security approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The security controller acts as an intermediary between the industrial control system and security threats. It collects security thumbprints from control elements, analyzes them for anomalies, and mediates the response by implementing graduated security actions that can contain threats before they cause physical damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive security monitoring is implemented across all control elements, then security coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential security information from control elements in the form of security thumbprints - compressed representations of control element states. This extraction approach provides comprehensive security monitoring without requiring the security controller to process or store complete system states, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter representation of control element states by converting complex system states into simplified security thumbprints. These thumbprints are compressed representations that retain security-relevant information while reducing data volume, enabling scalable monitoring across multiple control elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If uniform security responses are applied to all security threats, then response simplicity is maintained, but damage mitigation effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse simplicityVSAvoiddamage mitigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic, graduated security responses that adapt to the severity and type of detected threats. Rather than uniform responses, the security controller selects from multiple response levels (containing access, logging data, notifying personnel) based on the specific threat characteristics, optimizing damage mitigation while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3101586B1Active response security system for industrial control infrastructure
Publication Date: 2019.11.13 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • EP3101586B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3101586B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3101586B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An industrial controller resistant to malicious attacks may provide a graduated response employing the elements of the control system to reduce access to the control system, log data, and announce intrusion based on a dynamically evolving assessment of the severity of any detected security issues.