Grain Harvesting Implement with Modular Width and Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-propelled agricultural machines face issues such as transportation difficulties due to platform width, productivity losses from matter flowback, soil compaction, and energy inefficiencies due to constant input speed, leading to operational problems and accidents.

Innovation Solution

A grain harvesting implement with an articulation system for reduced width during transportation, an independent ground-tracing system for terrain adaptation, and a feeding speed control mechanism that adjusts proportionally to equipment speed, along with an extractor slat system to prevent matter flowback, ensuring steady inflow and minimizing losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the platform width is increased to improve harvesting capacity, then more rows can be harvested simultaneously, but transportation difficulties and accidents increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting capacityVSAvoidtransportation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The harvesting platform is divided into multiple independent modular units, each capable of harvesting one or more rows. These modules can be configured in different arrangements and can be detached or folded for transportation, allowing the platform to maintain high harvesting capacity while reducing transportation width when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the gathering band speed is increased to match higher driving speed, then productivity improves, but matter flowback and losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting speedVSAvoidmatter flowback
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The gathering band speed is made dynamically adjustable and is automatically controlled based on real-time detection of matter flow conditions. When flowback is detected, the system reduces gathering band speed to prevent losses; when flow is smooth, speed is increased to maintain high productivity. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between speed and flowback prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If constant input speed is maintained to simplify control, then system stability is improved, but energy waste occurs due to lack of matter or choking due to excessive matter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor matter flow conditions and automatically adjust the input speed of the harvesting system. When matter availability is low, speed is reduced to prevent energy waste; when matter flow is abundant, speed is increased to maximize productivity. This feedback-controlled speed adjustment maintains energy efficiency while preserving relatively simple control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If ground-tracing mechanical system is used to adapt to terrain profile, then harvesting adaptability improves, but soil compaction occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptationVSAvoidsoil compaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses lightweight ground-tracing mechanical elements that provide sufficient terrain following capability without exerting excessive force on the soil. The ground-tracing components are designed with reduced weight and optimized contact characteristics to counterbalance the need for terrain adaptation while minimizing soil compaction effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

5Loss of substance

If gathering height is reduced to improve harvesting quality, then matter flowback decreases, but productivity is reduced due to slower processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The gathering height is made dynamically adjustable rather than fixed. The system automatically optimizes gathering height based on crop conditions, matter flow characteristics, and processing capacity. This allows the system to maintain low gathering height when quality is paramount while enabling higher gathering heights when productivity is the priority, resolving the contradiction through real-time adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10849272B2Grain harvesting implement
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 IND REUNIDAS COLOMBO LTD
  • US10849272B2 patent drawing
  • US10849272B2 patent drawing
  • US10849272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An implement intended for harvesting and/or gathering farm produce is used together with a self-propelled agricultural machine, more specifically a grain harvester, in order to provide driving power for its crop processing systems. A top roller (11) is positioned at the rear end of each conveyor belt (1) whereby, internally and concentrically thereto, the supports (9) move in a continuous rotating movement with the slats (10); the conveyor belt (1) has electronics for adjusting the speeds of the machine and the belts, varying electronically between these magnitudes according to the proportionality parameter; in addition to also regulating the height of the conveyor belt (1B) through electronics and a pivoting device (26); the set of conveyor belts (1) may also be articulated into a transportation position.