Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet Manufacturing Texture Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing grain-oriented electrical steel sheets face challenges in controlling the texture of primary recrystallized sheets and effectively utilizing inhibitors, leading to suboptimal magnetic properties due to fine crystal grains formed during hot-rolled sheet annealing, which inhibit grain growth and reduce the frequency of Goss-oriented grains.

Innovation Solution

A method involving coarsening crystal grains before cold rolling, optimizing rough rolling conditions to increase low-strain crystal grains, and adjusting hot-rolled sheet annealing temperatures based on recrystallization ratios to create a suitable primary recrystallized texture, while actively utilizing inhibitors to achieve high magnetic flux density through secondary recrystallization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If slab heating temperature is increased to 1300°C or higher to solubilize inhibitors, then inhibitor fine precipitation is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitor fine precipitationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the inhibitor solubilization step from the slab heating process and relocates it to the hot-rolled sheet annealing stage. By taking out the high-temperature heating requirement from the initial slab heating and performing it later at a more economical stage, the patent achieves fine inhibitor precipitation without the need for expensive 1300°C+ slab heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a more economical heating approach by using hot-rolled sheet annealing (a shorter, lower-cost thermal process) instead of extended high-temperature slab heating. This disposable-like approach uses a targeted, short-duration thermal treatment at the optimal stage to achieve inhibitor precipitation without the continuous high-energy input of traditional slab heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Manufacturing precision

If crystal grain size before cold rolling is increased to improve Goss orientation, then magnetic flux density is improved, but texture control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic flux densityVSAvoidtexture control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing the desired crystal grain structure through high-temperature rough rolling before cold rolling. This preliminary texture formation creates a robust grain structure that is less sensitive to subsequent processing variations, thereby improving magnetic flux density while simplifying overall texture control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by controlling the finishing temperature to 950°C or higher to suppress inhibitor precipitation at this stage. This temperature parameter control allows larger crystal grains to form before cold rolling, improving Goss orientation and magnetic flux density, while the inhibitors still form later during hot-rolled sheet annealing to provide necessary grain boundary control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in grain-oriented electrical steel sheets with excellent magnetic properties, achieving a magnetic flux density of 1.935 T or higher by strictly controlling the texture and inhibitor distribution, enhancing energy efficiency and reducing transformer noise.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the steel slab to slab heating to a temperature of higher than a γ-phase precipitation temperature and 1380° C. or lower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolubilization: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the hot-rolled sheet to hot-rolled sheet annealing for soaking at a soaking temperature of 1000° C. or higher and (1150-2.5Y)° C. or lower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRecrystallization: Annealing

Implementation Method 3

subjecting the steel slab to slab heating to a temperature of higher than a γ-phase precipitation temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 4

rough rolling including at least two passes of rolling at a temperature of (temperature at which γ-phase fraction reaches its maximum −20° C.) or higher

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectγ-phase fraction:

Data Source

PatentUS20240233992A9Method of manufacturing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 JFE STEEL CORP

AI summary

The method includes slab-heating a steel slab to a temperature of higher than a γ-phase precipitation temperature and 1380° C. or lower, subjecting the steel slab to rough rolling including at least two passes of rolling at a predetermined temperature with an introduced sheet thickness true strain εt of 0.50 or more and to finish rolling with a rolling finish temperature of 900° C. or higher to obtain a hot-rolled sheet, cooling the hot-rolled sheet for 1 second or longer at a cooling rate of 70° C./s or higher within 2 seconds after finish rolling, coiling the sheet at a coiling temperature of 600° C. or lower, performing hot-rolled sheet annealing for soaking at a predetermined soaking temperature, and then performing cold rolling, primary recrystallization annealing, and secondary recrystallization annealing.